Teams

CV-Palm Desert TC/Skone

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-04vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Mary Kern vs Cheryl Yasis / Ann Tennyson6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charron vs Maria Himelman4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGillen Keogh / Janet Gugliotto vs Susan Markowitz / Hattie Grant6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Karen Bernthal vs Betty Matsumoto / Barbara Holmsten6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCarol Cornell / Jennifer Charron vs Dianne Dalton / Barbara Wood4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSara Asatiani vs Catherine Lind2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAda Ko / Suzy Skone vs Patricia Baughman / Suzette Willetts7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Kern / Sue Cannon vs Audrey Wu / Lesley Gagnon3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSara Asatiani vs Brooke Russo1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzy Skone / Ada Ko vs Audrey Wu / Sanae Chance4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGillen Keogh / Janet Gugliotto vs Maribeth Pullman / Lesley Gagnon7-5, 6-2
2023-02-11vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Mary Kern vs Rebecca Jasmine / Ann Tennyson6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSara Asatiani vs Cheryl Yasis6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGillen Keogh / Janet Gugliotto vs Ann Oswald / Blair Stone6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSuzy Skone / Mary Kern vs Tammy Roach / Alethea Platis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Asatiani vs Masami Ehrenreich6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMerri Wells / Carol Cornell vs Holly Simmons / Barbara Maher6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Gugliotto / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Becky Jones / Teresa Makhijani6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMary Kern / Merri Wells vs Dianne Dalton / Maureen Crover6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charron vs Catherine Lind2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAda Ko / Suzy Skone vs Suzette Willetts / Brooke Russo7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-21vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzy Skone / Gillen Keogh vs Susan Markowitz / Joyce Westerdahl1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Charron vs Rebecca Jasmine6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMerri Wells / Linda Blankenmeister vs Kelly Walecki / Ann Tennyson7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMary Kern / Jennifer Charron vs Tammy Roach / Jennifer Ruddell6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMerri Wells vs Maria Moya6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSuzy Skone / Carol Cornell vs Holly Simmons / Ailee Robertson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMary Kern / Sue Cannon vs Lori Tanking / Becky Jones6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSara Asatiani vs Masami Ehrenreich6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSuzy Skone / Merri Wells vs Andrea Howland - Cobb / Jennifer Ruddell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Cornell / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Alethea Platis / Traci Hylland6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Merri Wells
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.49
Sue Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Jennifer Charron
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Carol Cornell
published 3.5
3.24
Janet Gugliotto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Ingrid Sarapuu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Sara Asatiani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Suzy Skone
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Gillen Keogh
published 3.5
2.89
Karen Bernthal
published
Mary Kern
published
Myriam Wunder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzy Skone + Ingrid Sarapuu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merri Wells
70W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.67
Sue Cannon
99W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jennifer Charron
92W–104L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carol Cornell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Janet Gugliotto
60W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Ingrid Sarapuu
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sara Asatiani
51W–96L career · 9 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Suzy Skone
36W–74L career · 7 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Gillen Keogh
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Karen Bernthal
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.89
Linda Blankenmeister
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kern
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Myriam Wunder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.