Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Barnes & Simmons

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesTeresa Makhijani / Jennifer Ruddell vs Susan Caruso / Dianne Dalton2-6, 3-6
2023-02-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ruddell / Alethea Platis vs Heidi Kelly / Jill Delaney6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ruddell / Alethea Platis vs Denise Roethenmund / Brooke Russo4-6, 4-6
2023-02-04vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Jones / Teresa Makhijani vs Janet Gugliotto / Ingrid Sarapuu7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-01-28vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanice Savidge / Jennifer Ruddell vs Rebecca Jasmine / Ann Tennyson1-6, 5-7
2023-01-14vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Roach / Jennifer Ruddell vs Mary Kern / Jennifer Charron4-6, 4-6
2023-01-07vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Howland - Cobb / Jennifer Ruddell vs Suzy Skone / Merri Wells2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Ailee Robertson
published 3.5
Alethea Platis
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Tanking
published
3.16
Becky Jones
published 3.5
3.14
Barbara Maher
published 3.5
3.08
Janice Savidge
published
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Holly Simmons
published
Meg Zoretic
published
Tammy Roach
published
Teresa Makhijani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Teresa Urquhart
published
Traci Hylland
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Howland - Cobb
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Ailee Robertson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alethea Platis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Tanking
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Becky Jones
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Barbara Maher
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Janice Savidge
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
17W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Holly Simmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Zoretic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Roach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Makhijani
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Urquhart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Traci Hylland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.