Teams

LLW-CV-Desert Princess/Wright & Dickinson

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Denise Roethenmund vs Alethea Platis / Lori Tanking7-6, 7-6
2023-02-28vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesDianne Dalton / Barbara Wood vs Carol Cornell / Jennifer Charron6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Patricia Baughman vs Becky Jones / Lori Tanking1-6, 0-6
2023-02-04vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wood / Caroline Cavelti vs Barbara McDonald / Blair Stone6-3, 6-3
2023-01-28vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneWon 10
W#3 DoublesAudrey Wu / Barbara Wood vs Gillen Keogh / Shari Landa6-0, 6-0
2023-01-14vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Susan Caruso vs Gianna Riley / Ann Tennyson1-6, 3-6
2023-01-07vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & KimWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Caruso / Carolyn Wright vs Gianna Riley / Ann Oswald6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Lind
published 4
3.68
Brooke Russo
published 4
3.33
Suzette Willetts
published
3.31
Maribeth Pullman
published
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.27
Dianne Dalton
published 3.5
3.26
Lesley Gagnon
published
Barbara Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Caroline Cavelti
published 3.5
3.22
Audrey Wu
published 3.5
3.16
Carolyn Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Patricia Baughman
published
Sanae Chance
published
Susan Caruso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Wright + Lesley Gagnon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Lind
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Brooke Russo
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Suzette Willetts
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Maribeth Pullman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dianne Dalton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Lesley Gagnon
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Wood
53W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Cavelti
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Audrey Wu
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sanae Chance
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.