Search

Barbara Wood

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
85 matches · 53W–32L · seasons 20192025
Where Barbara sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Barbara is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barbara has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Barbara has gone from the 55th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.6% of games
3.5
62.5%
25W–15L · 53.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
Sarah Zuberec / Shirley Chow
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Carlesimo
0.040below expectation — took 50% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Faith Ricciuti / Nancy B Caudill
2025-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sonia Gleadle
+0.091better than expected — took 92% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Christine Roughan / Lori Tanking
2025-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzette Willetts
0.030below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Irene Pelletier / Nancy Jacoby
2025-02-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami DeVita
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Lindsy Lyons / Barbara Holmsten
2025-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianne Dalton
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Rebecca Ringer / Ellen Boyer
2025-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sonia Gleadle
+0.036better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Paula Buononato / Molly Hilll
2025-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Loseke
+0.011better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Susan Sacks / Lea Poirier
2025-01-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzette Willetts
0.076below expectation — took 20% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee Fletcher
0.034below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-09-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter
+0.006better than expected — took 72% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2024-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter
+0.011better than expected — took 92% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vidya Shastri
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.