Teams

Wagon Wheel/Martinez-Turic W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-28Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMarvi Chua Castro / Tina Anderson vs Jane Yau / Amanda Francis2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSheryl Barta / Indira Carvajal vs ROSEMARY BATES / Sara Wadlington0-6, 2-6
2025-06-21Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDenise Turic / Tina Anderson vs Tracy Akbany / Hilary McNamara0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Gannon / Susan Gulig vs Carlin Mihm / Kristie Lipper0-6, 0-6
2025-06-14Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIndira Carvajal / Suzanne Lewis vs Laurin Shambora / April Moeser0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gardner / Sheryl Barta vs Marlo Gooch / Michele Gurley1-6, 2-6
2025-06-07vs Oak Creek/Smith W3.5SWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheryl Barta / Robin Milton vs Margaret Stein / Denise Smith6-4, 2-5
W#2 DoublesTina Anderson / Marie Fry vs Meredith Ginn Lam / Sonja Buchanan6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Gannon / Amy Gardner vs Liz Knight / Tricia Plumb3-6, 0-6
2025-05-31Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarvi Chua Castro / Robin Milton vs Nicole Libby / Dawn Rochelle7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Gardner / Marie Fry vs Kelly Killinger / Anne French0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Gulig / Suzanne Lewis vs Robin Bates / Carrie Martinson4-6, 1-6
2025-05-17vs Garland/Biancardi-Hill W3.5SWon 21
W#2 DoublesSheryl Barta / Indira Carvajal vs Janet Blair / Cindy Alexander6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLaura Yanez vs Kathryn Dehmer2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTina Anderson / Marie Fry vs Betty Tobey / Stephana Delatorre6-4, 6-4
2025-05-10vs Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5SLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarvi Chua Castro / Suzanne Lewis vs Jill Heidorf / Aimee Griffin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTina Anderson / Sheryl Barta vs Torri Hansen / Mary Miles4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLaura Yanez vs Migdalia Ramirez4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Gulig / Denise Turic vs Kelly Dotson / Caroline Jecker2-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs High Point/Mallaki W3.5SLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Martinez / Indira Carvajal vs Jaleh Mallaki / Rashi Poddar2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarvi Chua Castro / Mitzi Bishop vs Jennifer Dugan / Noelle Ratliff2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Fry / Laura Yanez vs Annie Liu / Xiujie Lucy Zhou3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · S W. Saturday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Mulhern-Ricketts W3.5S8031924265
2RGAC/Lucas-Oelke W3.5S6127823243
3SpringPark/Bradley-Wilson W3.5S62271332281
4Lakes @ CH/Holdorf-Gerard W3.5S43231229267
5Garland/Sisk-Lin W3.5S44241636307
6Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S44192147348
7Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S44211948369
8Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5S35192144338
9LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S35162454387
10Oak Creek/Smith W3.5S35152556405
11The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S25142144316
12Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S26172347370
13Wagon Wheel/Martinez-Turic W3.5S26132758434
14Oak Creek/Kolb-Urias W3.5S1773367427
15Las Colinas/Bosworth W3.5S1783268435

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kayla Chen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Anne Gannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Indira Carvajal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Denise Turic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Laura Yanez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marie Fry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marvi Chua Castro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mitzi Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Milton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Sheryl Barta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Susan Gulig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Barta + Robin Milton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Chen
27W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3
Anne Gannon
0W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Indira Carvajal
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Denise Turic
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
2.56
Laura Yanez
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Fry
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marvi Chua Castro
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitzi Bishop
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Milton
7W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheryl Barta
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Gulig
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.