Teams

SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1

2021 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-01vs DTC #3Won 30
W#1 DoublesYang Kornuth / Jonna Gilmore vs Lani Wong / Janelle Wright6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRachael Sigsbee vs Barb Stanley6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShaza Nayef / Christy Moxley vs Christa Shiklanian / Dana Levin6-0, 6-1
2021-11-17vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristy Moxley / Courtney Fuhrmann vs Kara Gaston / Rachel Glaze6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJonna Gilmore vs Michelle Strahler6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Larson / Shaza Nayef vs Anna Clark / Richiena Vander Heyden6-2, 7-6
2021-11-10vs CANYON GATE #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristy Moxley / Yang Kornuth vs Athene Garfield / Stacy Sheeley Reyes7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJonna Gilmore vs Natasha Kattau4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachael Sigsbee / Taylor Larson vs Martha Langer / Rachel Kerr4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-03vs DTC #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesRachael Sigsbee / Christy Moxley vs Megan Bell / Ayumi Toyama7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Lamb vs Brynn Roberts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonna Gilmore / Courtney Fuhrmann vs Kellie Woods / Jessica Berger6-4, 6-2
2021-10-27vs TPCWon 30
W#1 DoublesYang Kornuth / Courtney Fuhrmann vs Alexis Michaud / Grace Schiffner6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJonna Gilmore vs Kimberly Maple6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShaza Nayef / Taylor Larson vs Katrina Braman / Melissa Puopolo6-0, 6-1
2021-10-20vs DTC #3Won 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Lamb / Christy Moxley vs Barb Stanley / Christa Shiklanian6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachael Sigsbee vs Melissa Orozco6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShaza Nayef / Jonna Gilmore vs Janelle Wright / Dana Levin6-1, 6-2
2021-10-13vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesYang Kornuth / Jonna Gilmore vs Kara Gaston / Stephanie Mitchell6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRachael Sigsbee vs Anna Clark6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Lamb / Shaza Nayef vs Talia Galvez / Michelle Strahler6-2, 6-4
2021-10-06vs CANYON GATE #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRachael Sigsbee / Christy Moxley vs Jill Morrison / Nadine Kluger1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Lamb vs Rachel Kerr6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTaylor Larson / Courtney Fuhrmann vs Natasha Kattau / Christy Shulman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-09-29vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCourtney Fuhrmann / Jonna Gilmore vs Megan Bell / Alexandra Clark6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTaylor Larson vs Jessica Berger2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShaza Nayef / Yang Kornuth vs Michal Halfon / Ayumi Toyama7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-09-22vs TPCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachael Sigsbee / Jonna Gilmore vs Susun Michaels / Alexis Michaud6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Lamb vs Nicole Chikhani6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShaza Nayef / Courtney Fuhrmann vs Sandra Thompson / Trish Metriyakool6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jonna Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.36
Rachel Lamb
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Courtney Fuhrmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.77
Shaza Nayef
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
Christy Moxley
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
Rachael Sigsbee
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3
Yang Kornuth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Taylor Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonna Gilmore + Taylor Larson4163% games+11.3% vs expected
Courtney Fuhrmann + Jonna Gilmore12364% games+9.3% vs expected
Rachael Sigsbee + Rachel Lamb18955% games+5.7% vs expected
Rachel Lamb + Christy Moxley8357% games−0.8% vs expected
Rachael Sigsbee + Christy Moxley2733% games−6.8% vs expected
Yang Kornuth + Rachel Lamb4254% gamesnot enough data
Christy Moxley + Jonna Gilmore1446% gamesnot enough data
Rachael Sigsbee + Jonna Gilmore314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jonna Gilmore
215W–97L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.86
Rachel Lamb
151W–74L career · 11 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Courtney Fuhrmann
49W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Shaza Nayef
129W–163L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Christy Moxley
60W–53L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Rachael Sigsbee
109W–93L career · 13 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Yang Kornuth
56W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Taylor Larson
29W–28L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.