← Search

Rachael Sigsbee

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
202 matches · 109W–93L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Rachael sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rachael is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachael has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rachael has gone from the 51st to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 61.1% of games
3.0
50%
24W–24L · 50.4% of games
3.5
47.7%
41W–45L · 49.4% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history202 matches
L
2025-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
−0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Lamb
−0.037below expectation — took 57% of games against 68% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Dawn Anderson / Kate Alred
2025-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Lamb
−0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Megan Bender / Karrie Bennallack
2025-04-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
−0.015below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Misti Webb
−0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Syme
−0.024below expectation — took 28% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Kate Alred / Brooke Rice
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Jones
+0.054better than expected — took 45% of games against 27% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jennifer Olson / Mary Gastro
2025-03-05 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Lamb
+0.003about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Kate Alred / Brooke Rice
2025-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Misti Webb
−0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Denise Mandelbaum / Susie Babcock
2025-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Misti Webb
+0.020better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2025-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Misti Webb
+0.036better than expected — took 62% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Sabine Curtis / Susan Gray
2025-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
+0.020better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.