Teams

LCTA39/Ruppel/DW

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Hill/CTC000000
2LCTA39/Tunick/Park West000000
3LCTA39/Munson/Maybank000000
4LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN000000
5LCTA39/Ring/Creekside000000
6LCTA39/Ruppel/DW000000
7LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes000000
8LCTA39/Kinney-Hansen/Snee Farm000000
9LCTA39/Harrison/MPR000000
10LCTA39/Hill/Maybank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Patterson
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Ruppel
published
3.16
Jane Emge
published
3.11
Cheryl Etheridge
published 3
3.04
Amy Passman
published 3
3.03
Carly Hara
published 3
3.01
Connie Biggs
published 3.5
3.00
Jennifer Browne
published
2.90
2.87
Anita Castles
published 3
2.63
Denise Lauer
published 3
2.44
Amber Dyer
published 3
Monica Pfohl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Passman + Carly Hara3255% games+10.5% vs expected
Amy Passman + Denise Lauer0632% games−4.4% vs expected
Barbara Breidenbruch + Denise Lauer0827% games−15.8% vs expected
Barbara Breidenbruch + Susan Ruppel044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Breidenbruch + Jane Emge033 matchesnot enough data
Amber Dyer + Amy Passman123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Passman + Anita Castles123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Passman + Susan Ruppel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Patterson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Ruppel
7W–25L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Jane Emge
16W–31L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Cheryl Etheridge
20W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
Amy Passman
36W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Carly Hara
52W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Connie Biggs
31W–45L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Browne
12W–22L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Barbara Breidenbruch
12W–64L career · type A · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Anita Castles
60W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Denise Lauer
10W–52L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Amber Dyer
44W–118L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Monica Pfohl
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.