Teams

LCTA39/Harrison/MPR

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Hill/CTC000000
2LCTA39/Tunick/Park West000000
3LCTA39/Munson/Maybank000000
4LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN000000
5LCTA39/Ring/Creekside000000
6LCTA39/Ruppel/DW000000
7LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes000000
8LCTA39/Kinney-Hansen/Snee Farm000000
9LCTA39/Harrison/MPR000000
10LCTA39/Hill/Maybank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Mary Cecil
published
3.22
Jill Leahy
published
3.21
Dianne Newton
published 3.5
3.15
Paula Register
published
3.13
Diane Rozier
published 3.5
3.12
Denise Barsness
published 3.5
3.12
Karen Reuther
published
3.08
Stacy Danosky
published
2.98
Andrea Harrison
published 3.5
2.97
Beverly Mckinley
published 3.5
2.93
Caryn Lyons
published 3.5
2.89
Minhthu Nguyen
published
2.79
Ann Tinker
published 3
2.79
Paige Kuehmeier
published
2.78
Bobbie Doyle
published 3
2.67
Trish Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Leahy + Andrea Harrison71047% games+0.3% vs expected
Karen Reuther + Beverly Mckinley2451% games−1.3% vs expected
Bobbie Doyle + Stacy Danosky8356% games−1.7% vs expected
Karen Reuther + Mary Cecil1437% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cecil + Beverly Mckinley2346% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cecil + Denise Barsness224 matchesnot enough data
Denise Barsness + Paula Register134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Reuther + Paige Kuehmeier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Cecil
39W–46L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Jill Leahy
27W–31L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dianne Newton
28W–19L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Paula Register
6W–19L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Diane Rozier
23W–44L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Denise Barsness
29W–51L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Karen Reuther
41W–58L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Stacy Danosky
50W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Andrea Harrison
33W–81L career · type A · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Beverly Mckinley
30W–51L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Caryn Lyons
14W–21L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
Minhthu Nguyen
73W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Ann Tinker
55W–85L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Paige Kuehmeier
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Bobbie Doyle
46W–47L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Trish Richardson
27W–29L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.