Teams

LCTA39/Hill/Maybank

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Hill/CTC000000
2LCTA39/Tunick/Park West000000
3LCTA39/Munson/Maybank000000
4LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN000000
5LCTA39/Ring/Creekside000000
6LCTA39/Ruppel/DW000000
7LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes000000
8LCTA39/Kinney-Hansen/Snee Farm000000
9LCTA39/Harrison/MPR000000
10LCTA39/Hill/Maybank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Tammy Trenholm
published
3.52
Lucy Chastain
published
3.37
Sue Grisanti
published
3.34
Adrienne Eischeid
published 3.5
3.34
Mandy Coleman
published
3.30
Denise Apple
published 3.5
3.27
Brooke Hanckel
published 3.5
Caroline Murphy
published 3.5
3.20
3.04
Anne Kapeluck
published 3.5
3.03
Dara Rosenfeld
published 3
2.95
Denise Samson
published 3
2.73
Joanne Darkey
published
Julie Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Eischeid + Lucy Chastain4266% games+13.6% vs expected
Tammy Trenholm + Lucy Chastain4160% games+7.6% vs expected
Tammy Trenholm + Mandy Coleman6355% games+2.2% vs expected
Anne Kapeluck + Brooke Hanckel8455% games−2.2% vs expected
Anne Kapeluck + Joanne Darkey1547% games−4.5% vs expected
Denise Apple + Denise Samson314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Kapeluck + Julie Hill044 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Hanckel + Catherine Kannenberg404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Trenholm
68W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Lucy Chastain
25W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Sue Grisanti
58W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Adrienne Eischeid
49W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Mandy Coleman
80W–69L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Denise Apple
37W–36L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Norine Nelson Martin
28W–16L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brooke Hanckel
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Murphy
10W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Kannenberg
35W–39L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Anne Kapeluck
31W–37L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Dara Rosenfeld
58W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Denise Samson
50W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Joanne Darkey
35W–48L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Julie Hill
32W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.