Teams

LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Hill/CTC000000
2LCTA39/Tunick/Park West000000
3LCTA39/Munson/Maybank000000
4LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN000000
5LCTA39/Ring/Creekside000000
6LCTA39/Ruppel/DW000000
7LCTA39/Witheford/Wild Dunes000000
8LCTA39/Kinney-Hansen/Snee Farm000000
9LCTA39/Harrison/MPR000000
10LCTA39/Hill/Maybank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Tammy Golder
published
3.26
Heather Witheford
published 3.5
Barbara Jorgensen
published 3.5
Donna Ondrof
published 3.5
3.20
Kathi Schuitema
published
3.20
Jill Ilario
published
3.20
Susan Cangelosi
published
3.01
Maggie Tully
published
2.96
Brenda McCurry
published 3
2.88
Sue Wohlford-Bork
published
2.85
Lisa Wolverton
published
2.76
Carrie Riddle
published 3
2.69
Ashley Gaston
published 3
2.67
2.58
Dede Davidson
published 3
Lynette Korte
published
Pamela Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Jorgensen + Jill Ilario11457% games+4.9% vs expected
Heather Witheford + Lynette Korte61049% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathi Schuitema + Jill Ilario7648% games−8.4% vs expected
Ashley Gaston + Sue Wohlford-Bork4359% gamesnot enough data
Lynette Korte + Maggie Tully4256% gamesnot enough data
Sue Wohlford-Bork + Brenda McCurry5066% gamesnot enough data
Kathi Schuitema + Lynette Korte224 matchesnot enough data
Kathi Schuitema + Christy Humphries224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Golder
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heather Witheford
63W–53L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Jorgensen
28W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Donna Ondrof
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathi Schuitema
41W–34L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Jill Ilario
38W–39L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
Susan Cangelosi
41W–31L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
Maggie Tully
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Brenda McCurry
42W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Sue Wohlford-Bork
49W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lisa Wolverton
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Carrie Riddle
38W–29L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ashley Gaston
41W–34L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Christy Humphries
25W–44L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Dede Davidson
40W–29L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Lynette Korte
24W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Jones
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.