Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $24

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

19 players · average NTRP 3.94 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Debbie Skowron vs Shannon Pirron / Anne Ordway6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wasylenko / Diedre Castaldo vs Lara Phillips / Keiko Okuda6-4, 3-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRina Daw / Wendy Leto vs Mya Murata / Barbara Lee-Budin6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCynthia McCarthy / Colleen Stover vs Christi Cashman / Cheryl Ingram6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Kerri Sedlacek vs Kelly O'Donnell / Diana Heyer6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Dorothy OMalley vs Anne Ordway / Dawn Baumann1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Kristie Traverso vs Christina Greeley / Sheryl Albert1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRina Daw / Kerri Sedlacek vs Laura Hansen / Laura Pearson4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Cindy MacDonald vs Patricia Behnke / Michelle Reynolds6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRina Daw / Margaret McAndrews vs Nancy Maska / Ann Wiet6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Debbie Skowron vs Elizabeth Bowker / Janice McKane6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Skryd / Rina Daw vs Robyn Hurtig / Paula McKendry2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Debbie Skowron vs Anne Zanella-Gleason / Conni Stinek6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColleen Stover / Janine Stalcup vs Renee Buxton / Debra Brambora7-6, 0-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2210229719228
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Sat 12 $2293221433289
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $2293221435304
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2266181841303
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $2448142248321
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $2239122454363
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $2211192759391
8DROPPED CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Colleen Stover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Cindy MacDonald
published 4
3.68
3.67
Wendy Leto
published 4
3.66
Diana Pavlova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
published 4
3.63
Mary Sullivan
published 4
3.62
Kristie Traverso
published 4
3.60
Dorothy OMalley
published 4
3.57
Diedre Castaldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kerri Sedlacek
published 4
3.53
Rina Daw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Martha Skryd
published 4
3.47
Kelly Tenuta
published 4
3.38
Janine Stalcup
published 3.5
3.36
Margaret McAndrews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Patricia Stifter
published 3.5
3.27
Cynthia McCarthy
published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Skowron + Diedre Castaldo5263% games+23.5% vs expected
Kristie Traverso + Cynthia McCarthy8262% games+13.2% vs expected
Kerri Sedlacek + Mary Sullivan21044% games+6.0% vs expected
Cindy MacDonald + Catherine Wasylenko4357% games+5.5% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Martha Skryd8851% games+3.0% vs expected
Diedre Castaldo + Kelly Tenuta2539% games+2.4% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Mary Sullivan2440% games+1.8% vs expected
Cindy MacDonald + Katherine Bianchi8159% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Stover
89W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Cindy MacDonald
74W–52L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Catherine Wasylenko
102W–88L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Wendy Leto
109W–80L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Diana Pavlova
20W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Debbie Skowron
64W–54L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Mary Sullivan
47W–59L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Kristie Traverso
46W–38L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Diedre Castaldo
49W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Kerri Sedlacek
99W–73L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
Rina Daw
34W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Kelly Tenuta
90W–94L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Janine Stalcup
86W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Margaret McAndrews
75W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Patricia Stifter
31W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.