Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

18 players · average NTRP 3.97 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesBeth Immen / Terra Jahns vs Raquel Karpinski / Irene Powers6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBeth Immen / Lici Lytle vs Andrea Carrier / Diane McKillen6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Janice McKane vs Stephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Immen / Marilyn Tansey vs Dawn Kenny / Heike Spahn6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLici Lytle / Teri Ayotte vs Cindy MacDonald / Catherine Wasylenko3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2210229719228
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Sat 12 $2293221433289
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $2293221435304
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2266181841303
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $2448142248321
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $2239122454363
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $2211192759391
8DROPPED CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Terri Whiting
published 4.5
3.96
Nancy Cushing
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.89
3.89
Terra Jahns
published 4
3.86
Beth Immen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Marilyn Tansey
published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.70
Lici Lytle
published 4
3.68
Lori Raffone
published 4
3.68
Lori Saguto
published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
published 4
3.59
Linda Borst
published 4
3.52
Janice McKane
published 4
3.50
Conni Stinek
published 4
3.43
Alja Hessami-Maas
published 3.5
3.42
Renee Buxton
published 4
3.40
Erica Donofrio
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Teri Ayotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Eisner + Nancy Cushing6077% games+13.1% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Lori Saguto13164% games+9.9% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Linda Borst281357% games+8.8% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Anne Zanella-Gleason11169% games+7.7% vs expected
Erica Eisner + Linda Borst5554% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Raffone + Linda Borst4154% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Saguto + Marilyn Tansey10458% games+5.6% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Lori Raffone6454% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Nancy Cushing
236W–117L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Beth Immen
35W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Marilyn Tansey
216W–144L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Lici Lytle
55W–70L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lori Raffone
81W–81L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lori Saguto
223W–119L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Linda Borst
78W–75L career · no lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Janice McKane
30W–35L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
214W–213L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Renee Buxton
141W–123L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Erica Donofrio
51W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Teri Ayotte
66W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.