Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesLara Phillips / Keiko Okuda vs Catherine Wasylenko / Diedre Castaldo4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Keiko Okuda vs Kate Newman / Patricia Nick6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2210229719228
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Sat 12 $2293221433289
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $2293221435304
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2266181841303
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $2448142248321
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $2239122454363
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $2211192759391
8DROPPED CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
published 4
3.77
Lara Phillips
published 4
Erin Wyatt
published 4
3.72
Patricia Behnke
published 4
3.65
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.63
Raquel Karpinski
published 4
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.60
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.52
Irene Powers
published 4
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.42
Nancy Maska
published 3.5
3.23
Ann Wiet
published 3.5
3.16
Julie Pawula
published 3.5
3.12
Mishez Avari
published 3.5
Keiko Okuda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Batka + Patricia Behnke8556% games+3.5% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Margo Carvell12855% games+2.6% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Raquel Karpinski91451% games+2.2% vs expected
Mya Murata + Lara Phillips4262% games+2.1% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Raquel Karpinski6552% games+1.7% vs expected
Mya Murata + Patricia Behnke6257% games+1.6% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Patricia Behnke7751% games+0.7% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Erin Wyatt121352% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Erin Wyatt
20W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Margo Carvell
139W–96L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Raquel Karpinski
83W–105L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Barbara Lee-Budin
10W–24L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Irene Powers
32W–41L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Nancy Maska
52W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ann Wiet
102W–97L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Mishez Avari
53W–87L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Keiko Okuda
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.