Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22

CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W · E

24 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Laura Seaman vs Elizabeth Bowker / Terra Jahns3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLing Arenson / Molly Shapiro vs Debra Brambora / Marilyn Tansey0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLing Arenson / Julie Weidner vs Terra Jahns / Anne Zanella-Gleason1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Tracy Richards vs Elizabeth Bowker / Renee Buxton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Desiree Witte vs Alja Hessami-Maas / Terri Whiting6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFran Wiechart / Tracy Richards vs Patricia Stifter / Kristie Traverso6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAnn Murtaugh / Laura Seaman vs Laura Hansen / Christine Orr6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Fran Wiechart vs Laurie Gray / Anne Ordway6-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesRochelle Meng / Molly Shapiro vs Patricia Nelson / Carlene Motto6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Tracy Richards vs Cindy MacDonald / Kristie Traverso6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLaura Seaman / Tracy Richards vs Raquel Karpinski / Lara Phillips6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Fran Wiechart vs Carlene Motto / Patricia Nelson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Richards / Maura Starshak vs Angela Hanson / Apple Naughton6-2, 5-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Seaman / Fran Wiechart vs Kate Newman / Noreen Ohcana6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2210229719228
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Sat 12 $2293221433289
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $2293221435304
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2266181841303
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $2448142248321
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Centre Carvell Sun 10 $2239122454363
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $2211192759391
8DROPPED CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jennifer Goldfarb
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Jennifer Langtry
published 4.5
4.08
4.03
Jill Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Soraya McTeague
published 4.5
3.96
Desiree Witte
published 4
3.94
Laura Seaman
published
3.92
Cara Waddle
published 4
3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Molly Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Annette Hennessy
published 4
3.73
Ann Murtaugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Laura Purcell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Fran Wiechart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Maura Starshak
published 4
3.60
Rochelle Meng
published 4
3.60
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.56
Nancy Manolis
published 4
3.46
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.36
Irene Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Rosemary Swierk
published 3.5
Anne Ryan
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Richards + Jennifer Langtry5260% games+15.6% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Jill Siegel4366% games+13.9% vs expected
Molly Shapiro + Desiree Witte5158% games+9.2% vs expected
Tracy Richards + Ann Murtaugh7458% games+7.7% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+3.5% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Fran Wiechart5451% games+3.3% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner193049% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Goldfarb
61W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Jennifer Langtry
244W–109L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Christine Rosenkrantz
26W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Jill Siegel
70W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Soraya McTeague
162W–103L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Desiree Witte
254W–183L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
Laura Seaman
74W–58L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Cara Waddle
150W–116L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Molly Shapiro
49W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Annette Hennessy
150W–161L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Ann Murtaugh
137W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Elizabeth Quigley
90W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Laura Purcell
152W–152L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Fran Wiechart
35W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Julie Weidner
146W–137L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Maura Starshak
85W–44L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Rochelle Meng
178W–190L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
265W–225L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Irene Salerno
67W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Rosemary Swierk
70W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Anne Ryan
22W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.