Teams

Johnson 4.5W 40s Mon AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-13vs Abraham 4.5W 40s Mon AMLost 02
L#1 DoublesJody Fleming / Chris Schermerhorn vs Linda Helms / Whitney Ellis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Crews / Layne King vs Bridget Gislimberti / Jennifer Mays6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-22vs Alvarino/Churchill 4.5W 40s Mon AMLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Crews / Kim Priddy vs Catherine Egerton / Beth Bell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs Vandeplancke 4.5W 40s Mon AMWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlison Crews vs Evelyn Strader6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Schermerhorn / Jody Fleming vs Pam McAmis / Shawn McFarlin6-2, 6-1
2024-04-08vs Abraham 4.5W 40s Mon AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesCari Powell / Alison Crews vs Sara Nundkumar / Florence Henon6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Kim Littrell
published
4.04
Alison Crews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.97
Aundrea Hendley
published 4.5
3.89
Sheri Romaine
published
3.88
Kissie Stroup
published
3.83
Cari Powell
published 4
3.78
Jody Fleming
published
3.71
Cathy Soblesky
published 4
3.70
Alice Procter
published 4
3.69
Chris Schermerhorn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Layne King
published
Kim Priddy
published
Melinda Morton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aundrea Hendley + Kissie Stroup6259% gamesnot enough data
Chris Schermerhorn + Cathy Soblesky4155% gamesnot enough data
Alison Crews + Cathy Soblesky224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Littrell
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Alison Crews
113W–61L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
4.04
4.5
Aundrea Hendley
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
Sheri Romaine
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Kissie Stroup
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Cari Powell
34W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Jody Fleming
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Cathy Soblesky
103W–71L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Alice Procter
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Chris Schermerhorn
83W–43L career · 8 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Layne King
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kim Priddy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Morton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.