Teams

COLLIER/Miller/Combo50&over7.5W

2024 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Archie / Nancy Harbert vs Diane Hills / Brenda Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-13vs Players Club - J. WautersWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Harbert / Linda Smith vs Cathy de Bear / Susan Dow6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Aldrich / Veronica Howell vs Francis Sude / Sue Wolf7-5, 7-5
2024-04-15vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Harbert / Linda Smith vs Aggie Rupert / Cheryl Toth6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristine Miller / Joan Stolberg vs Greta Beatty / Brenda Bensmiller6-0, 7-5
2024-04-08vs Fiddlers Creek - MichaelLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Stolberg / Kristine Miller vs Jennifer Bauer / Marianne Khayat7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Cindy McDonough
published 4
3.27
Bernadette Devoe
published 3.5
Janet Seidl
published
Jennifer Archie
published
Joan Stolberg
published
Karyn Sardar
published
Kristine Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Werchek
published
Nancy Harbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Peggy Hogan
published
Susan Aldrich
published
Susan Caskey
published
Veronica Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Harbert + Veronica Howell9754% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Harbert + Karyn Sardar9162% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Werchek + Veronica Howell5254% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Hogan + Susan Caskey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy McDonough
6W–23L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Bernadette Devoe
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Janet Seidl
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Archie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joan Stolberg
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karyn Sardar
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Miller
55W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Werchek
55W–48L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Harbert
148W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Hogan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Aldrich
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Caskey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Veronica Howell
42W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.