Teams

CHABOT CANYON 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lisa Sennott
published
3.79
Darla Flanagan
published 4
3.74
Kalliope Bellesis
published
3.74
3.64
Jennifer Shipp
published
3.57
Melissa Abadia
published
3.55
Kristina Lovato
published
3.52
Nancy Selph
published
3.49
Penny Anderson
published
3.48
Michele Astorian
published
3.41
Debbie Chang
published 3.5
3.40
MacKenzie Flanagan
published
3.39
Lyn Hunter
published
3.37
Janet Daly
published
3.26
Samanda Dorger
published
3.20
Michelle Philpot
published
3.15
Kathleen Maynard
published
3.15
Jennifer Tetler
published
2.59
Julie Wunderlich
published
Linda M Scaparotti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Shipp + Lisa Sennott7060% games+5.3% vs expected
Kristina Lovato + Melissa Abadia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Sennott
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Alanna Coopersmith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Darla Flanagan
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kalliope Bellesis
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Amanda Makarevich
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Jennifer Shipp
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Abadia
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.57
Kristina Lovato
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Nancy Selph
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
Penny Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michele Astorian
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
3.5
Debbie Chang
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
MacKenzie Flanagan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Lyn Hunter
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
Janet Daly
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Samanda Dorger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Michelle Philpot
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Kathleen Maynard
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Jennifer Tetler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Julie Wunderlich
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.59
Linda M Scaparotti
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.