Teams

PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Men 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-09vs BAY TREES PK 65AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Gee / David Mayer vs Ken Fagel / Daniel Burbank7-6, 6-3
2025-04-04vs CROW CANYON CC 65AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Kenneth Neumeister vs Dean Christman / John Riley6-4, 6-1
2025-04-02vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 65AM7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Mayer / John Hotchkiss vs Keith Ma / Manohar S Sohal2-6, 3-6
2025-03-19vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 65AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Kenneth Neumeister vs Gary Fries / James Tung6-0, 6-1
2025-03-11vs CROW CANYON CC 65AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Gee / David Mayer vs Dean Christman / John Riley7-6, 6-3
2025-03-03vs BAY TREES PK 65AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Kenneth Neumeister vs Chester Low / Joseph Alunan6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Roy Rocero
published
Alexander Warren
published 3.5
Crawford Carpenter
published 3.5
David Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.20
John Barsky
published
3.01
Bill Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Fred Dasalla
published
Gary Soto
published
Ignatius Chan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jerry Garcia
published
John Puckett
published
Kenneth Neumeister
published
Robert Gee
published
Tosh Okano
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roy Rocero
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Alexander Warren
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Crawford Carpenter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Mayer
120W–122L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Barsky
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Bill Freeman
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Fred Dasalla
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Soto
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ignatius Chan
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jerry Garcia
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Puckett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenneth Neumeister
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Gee
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tosh Okano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.