Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesMadeline Shellhouse / Jessica Thornton vs Robyn Sickler / Emily Dutta7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLynette Leighton vs Vanessa Canlas1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLindy Bouwer / Michelle van de Pol vs Sahra Pak / Katie Gainsback6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWendy Lombardi vs Maggie Celestini3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKristi Kaiser / Lindsey Levine vs Sahra Pak / Sarah Ruffins7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrie Cadman vs Vanessa Canlas4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Lombardi / Madeline Shellhouse vs Vivian Martin / Wendy Duncan6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSarah Marriott vs Candace Fehrenbacher6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDiane de Seve / Jamie Cegelski vs Robyn Sickler / Emily Dutta4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLindsey Levine / Jessica Thornton vs Sahra Pak / Shannon Knapp6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichelle van de Pol vs Vanessa Canlas3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Wagner / Wendy Lombardi vs Hilary Leif / Dilcie Paschall6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJessica di Fede vs Maggie Celestini0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Aldrich / Lynette Leighton vs Terry Christophel / Denise Zeigler6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesKristi Sanders / Michelle van de Pol vs Sahra Pak / Candace Fehrenbacher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Marriott vs Maggie Celestini7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLindy Bouwer / Susan Johnson vs Emily Dutta / Robyn Sickler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLorena Serro vs Vanessa Canlas0-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Wong / Laura Gaffey vs Denise Zeigler / Michelle Cabrera3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Brie Cadman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lindsey Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Jessica Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Michelle van de Pol
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Kristi Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Wendy Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Madeline Shellhouse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Sarah Marriott
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Kristi Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Melissa Hahn
published
2.79
Lisa Aldrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Lori Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Jamie Cegelski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Lynette Leighton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Lara Abbott
published
2.69
Lindy Bouwer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Alison Dragoo
published 3
2.46
Diane de Seve
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Jessica di Fede
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.29
Laura Gaffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lorena Serro
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mari Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Kaiser + Kristi Sanders5451% games+2.9% vs expected
Kristi Kaiser + Madeline Shellhouse123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brie Cadman
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Lindsey Levine
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michelle van de Pol
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kristi Sanders
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Wendy Lombardi
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Madeline Shellhouse
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sarah Marriott
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kristi Kaiser
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
Melissa Hahn
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Lisa Aldrich
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Lori Wagner
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jamie Cegelski
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Lynette Leighton
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Lara Abbott
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Lindy Bouwer
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Alison Dragoo
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
2.5
Diane de Seve
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Jessica di Fede
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Laura Gaffey
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
Lorena Serro
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mari Morris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.