Teams

Harlan 18+ 4.0W Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 4.0 Women Singles Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-07vs Ray 18+ 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesTracy Harlan vs Melissa Goodman6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSara Strassell vs Sally Eagleton5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Carol Schuck Dillon6-1, 6-1
2025-07-25vs Ray 18+ 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesJordan Hedrick vs Sally Eagleton6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Sayaka Matsuoka2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Kara Ray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-10vs East 18s Singles 4.0W Thurs PMWon 10
W#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Rebekah East6-1, 6-4
2025-06-26vs Ray 18+ 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesJordan Hedrick vs Sayaka Matsuoka2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Kelly Gekas2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Howell vs Carol Schuck Dillon6-2, 6-1
2025-06-19vs East 18s Singles 4.0W Thurs PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Danielle Laliberte6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Sally Bowman6-0, 6-1
2025-06-08vs Ray 18+ 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Sally Eagleton1-6, 2-6
2025-05-29vs East 18s Singles 4.0W Thurs PMWon 10
W#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Sarah Schott6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jordan Hedrick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Sarah Howell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.71
Sara Strassell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Julie Dover
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.64
Tracy Harlan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Kim Hunt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Melissa Beeson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Strassell + Sarah Howell5263% games+5.8% vs expected
Kim Hunt + Tracy Harlan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Hedrick
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Sara Strassell
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Tracy Harlan
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Kim Hunt
222W–160L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Beeson
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.