Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Pal Lange Sat 2 $26

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCherrie Han / Gabrielle Esposito vs Nancy Dolan / Ginny Lazarus0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Louden / Suzanne Nagel vs Leena Bhat / Amanda Ripp4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Pamela Niro vs Katherine Cassou / Keiko Anno6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Lange / Jacqueline Lakely vs Elham Abboud / Chris Nelson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Nagel / Kelleen Thut vs Samantha Garrity / Kim Vandegrift3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesStacey Crossman / Gabrielle Esposito vs Jessica Vahey / Jane Ford3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Lange / Patti Tzoubris vs Krista Hogarth / Lauren Traficanto2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Lange / Stacey Watson vs Catie Burns / Rocelyn Caviles6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Elizabeth Lucy Buckley vs Tricia Mendoza / Tricia Lewis5-7, 5-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Tzoubris / Elizabeth Lucy Buckley vs Beth Garino / Jan James-Calvert6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Jacqueline Lakely vs Elise Bergman / Julie Lawin7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Lange / Miriam Wozniewski vs Irene Okada / Yan Gao4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Stacey Crossman vs Amy Shappert / Elizabeh Williams6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2551191127231
2CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2042181230243
3CDTA S 18&O 3.0W S Barrington Burns Mon 7 $2042171333267
4CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2533141635273
5CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Centennial Cohen Sun 11 $2033121841276
6CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Pal Lange Sat 2 $2615131734263
7CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2515121842298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kelly Couris
published 4
3.55
Elizabeth Lucy Buckley
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Sharon Snyder
published
3.11
Stacey Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
2.93
Catherine Lange
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Cherrie Han
published 3
2.76
Kelleen Thut
published 3
2.60
Gabrielle Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Pamela Niro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patti Tzoubris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Crossman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Nagel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherrie Han + Catherine Lange11452% games+14.7% vs expected
Stacey Watson + Elizabeth Lucy Buckley10357% games+12.5% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Sharon Snyder181454% games+11.1% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Jacqueline Lakely5646% games+1.6% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Sharon Snyder13755% games+0.2% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Jacqueline Lakely9954% games−0.4% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Sharon Snyder121647% games−3.9% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Gabrielle Esposito3540% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Couris
90W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Elizabeth Lucy Buckley
90W–78L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
Sharon Snyder
97W–93L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.19
Stacey Watson
52W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Catherine Lange
80W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kelleen Thut
65W–104L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Gabrielle Esposito
13W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Pamela Niro
24W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Miriam Wozniewski
39W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Tzoubris
30W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Crossman
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Nagel
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.