Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.22 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesMichele Anderson / Dagmara Kolesnichenko vs Catie Burns / Sukanya Ganesan6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesYan Gao vs Lyndsay Cavanagh2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Anderson / Irene Okada vs Michele Motta / Anna Swanson6-3, 2-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristina Kallianis / Baujun Liu vs Lauren Traficanto / Hannah Alphs Jackson2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMichele Anderson / Julie Gordon vs Rachel Fuller / Mariana Ingersoll0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYan Gao vs Tina Ho6-3, 4-3
L#2 DoublesKristina Kallianis / Vilma Mitev vs Jamie Burns / Jan James-Calvert4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichele Anderson / Julie Gordon vs ELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDagmara Kolesnichenko vs Lee Hart4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPam Cohen / Kristina Kallianis vs Prabha Parameswaran / Anne Bretland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-11Split 11
L#1 SinglesMichele Anderson vs Betsy Miller0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesIrene Okada / Yan Gao vs Kim Vandegrift / Jennifer Busse6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesIrene Okada / Yan Gao vs Catherine Lange / Miriam Wozniewski6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2551191127231
2CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2042181230243
3CDTA S 18&O 3.0W S Barrington Burns Mon 7 $2042171333267
4CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2533141635273
5CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Centennial Cohen Sun 11 $2033121841276
6CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Pal Lange Sat 2 $2615131734263
7CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2515121842298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Irene Okada
published 3.5
3.28
Dagmara Kolesnichenko
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Vilma Mitev
published 3.5
3.21
Kimberly Pfahl
published 3.5
3.15
Beatrisa Paz
published 3.5
3.04
Michele Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.81
Aimee Hombach
published 3
2.69
Sheila Henretta
published 3
2.56
Amy Shappert
published 3
Andrea Best
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Davis
published 0
Kristina Kallianis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Yan Gao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Okada + Michele Anderson44466% games+11.2% vs expected
Sheila Henretta + Andrea Best0643% games+10.5% vs expected
Yan Gao + Kimberly Pfahl16362% games+10.3% vs expected
Irene Okada + Yan Gao14160% games+6.2% vs expected
Vilma Mitev + Dagmara Kolesnichenko291361% games+5.0% vs expected
Michele Anderson + Vilma Mitev101147% games+0.0% vs expected
Irene Okada + Vilma Mitev351756% games−1.7% vs expected
Andrea Best + Amy Shappert51836% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Irene Okada
130W–68L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dagmara Kolesnichenko
54W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Vilma Mitev
111W–99L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Kimberly Pfahl
55W–40L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Beatrisa Paz
170W–136L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Michele Anderson
108W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Aimee Hombach
43W–46L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Sheila Henretta
59W–78L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Amy Shappert
83W–104L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Andrea Best
24W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Jennifer Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristina Kallianis
25W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Cohen
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yan Gao
77W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.