Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Centennial Cohen Sun 11 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesNancy Dolan / Ginny Lazarus vs Cherrie Han / Gabrielle Esposito6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Vinokur vs Kelly Couris0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeena Bhat / Amanda Ripp vs Molly Louden / Suzanne Nagel6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Cassou / Keiko Anno vs Jacqueline Lakely / Pamela Niro3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNancy Dolan / ELIZABETH BULF vs Catie Burns / Laura Pearson3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Vinokur vs Amy Byrne3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGinny Lazarus / C Mc vs Michelle Forney / Lisa Thorn1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCHRISTINE TAN / Karin Steinbrueck vs Elaine Pieropan / Tricia Lewis4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus vs Michele Anderson / Julie Gordon6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesC Mc / Amanda Ripp vs Vilma Mitev / Irene Okada6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPrabha Parameswaran / Anne Bretland vs Pam Cohen / Kristina Kallianis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus vs Kathy Clark / Jane Ford6-7, 1-5
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Vinokur vs Selma Bouhl7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Bretland / Amanda Ripp vs Krista Hogarth / Jamie Brady0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPrabha Parameswaran / Karin Steinbrueck vs Dina DeLaurentis / Jane Hensel4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus vs Chris Nelson / Veena Kulkarni5-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Vinokur vs Jean Niemi6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeena Bhat / Katherine Cassou vs Kim Vandegrift / Samantha Garrity5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMegan Crisham / Leena Bhat vs Beth Garino / Sarah Jamieson2-5
W#2 DoublesELIZABETH BULF / C Mc vs Cynthia Rowe / Kristin Walter6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatherine Cassou / Anne Bretland vs Jan James-Calvert / Julie Lawin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2551191127231
2CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2042181230243
3CDTA S 18&O 3.0W S Barrington Burns Mon 7 $2042171333267
4CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2533141635273
5CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Centennial Cohen Sun 11 $2033121841276
6CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Pal Lange Sat 2 $2615131734263
7CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2515121842298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Svetlana Vinokur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.16
Megan Crisham
published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.97
Ginny Lazarus
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
ELIZABETH BULF
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Amanda Ripp
published 3
Alex Doty
published 3
2.72
Leena Bhat
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
CHRISTINE TAN
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.52
2.50
Karin Steinbrueck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Bretland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
C Mc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Cassou
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Keiko Anno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leena Bhat + Amanda Ripp23956% games+8.2% vs expected
Ginny Lazarus + ELIZABETH BULF221853% games+5.3% vs expected
Amanda Ripp + ELIZABETH BULF3943% games+3.7% vs expected
Amanda Ripp + Svetlana Vinokur10456% games−6.0% vs expected
Prabha Parameswaran + Karin Steinbrueck41736% games−7.0% vs expected
Ginny Lazarus + Amanda Ripp4545% gamesnot enough data
Ginny Lazarus + Nancy Dolan5357% gamesnot enough data
Prabha Parameswaran + Amanda Ripp4350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Svetlana Vinokur
42W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Megan Crisham
138W–161L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Nancy Dolan
69W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Ginny Lazarus
75W–101L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
ELIZABETH BULF
41W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Amanda Ripp
55W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Alex Doty
10W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leena Bhat
44W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
CHRISTINE TAN
36W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Prabha Parameswaran
36W–74L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karin Steinbrueck
14W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.50
Anne Bretland
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
C Mc
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Cassou
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keiko Anno
3W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.