Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.30 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesSusan Schierl Sullivan / Jamie Brady vs Kimberly Pfahl / Julie Gordon6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Motta / Anna Swanson vs Michele Anderson / Irene Okada3-6, 5-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Traficanto / Hannah Alphs Jackson vs Kristina Kallianis / Baujun Liu6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLaura Cherry / Jessica Vahey vs Mariana Ingersoll / Rachel Fuller6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHannah Alphs Jackson vs Tina Ho4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSanda Petrut / Anna Swanson vs Jamie Burns / Sarah Jamieson7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulianne Hartzell / Katie Boyle vs Elise Bergman / Sabrina Jimenez-Pantoja6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJessica Vahey / Jane Ford vs Stacey Crossman / Gabrielle Esposito6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErin Baker vs Kelly Couris3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Clark / Michele Motta vs Pamela Jackson / Elizabeth Lucy Buckley5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKrista Hogarth / Lauren Traficanto vs Catherine Lange / Patti Tzoubris6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKathy Clark / Jane Ford vs ELIZABETH BULF / Ginny Lazarus7-6, 5-1
W#2 DoublesKrista Hogarth / Jamie Brady vs Anne Bretland / Amanda Ripp6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDina DeLaurentis / Jane Hensel vs Prabha Parameswaran / Karin Steinbrueck6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesAnna Swanson / Jessica Vahey vs Laura Pearson / Katie Jasper3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Yuen vs Amy Byrne3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Motta / Susan Schierl Sullivan vs Michelle Forney / Elaine Pieropan1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulianne Hartzell / Jane Hensel vs Tena Bucalo / Shabnam Singh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-15Split 11
L#1 DoublesJamie Brady / Michelle Yuen vs Tonya Pfeifle / Betsy Miller6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSelma Bouhl / Sanda Petrut vs Chris Nelson / Kim Vandegrift6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2551191127231
2CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2042181230243
3CDTA S 18&O 3.0W S Barrington Burns Mon 7 $2042171333267
4CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2533141635273
5CDTA S 18&O 3.0W Centennial Cohen Sun 11 $2033121841276
6CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Pal Lange Sat 2 $2615131734263
7CDTA S 18&O 3.0W MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2515121842298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jane Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lyndsay Cavanagh
usually #2 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.39
Sherry Polachek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Michelle Yuen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Jessica Vahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Baker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Hannah Alphs Jackson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Laura Cherry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Katie Boyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Anna Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Selma Bouhl
published 3
3.02
2.88
2.85
Dina DeLaurentis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Lauren Traficanto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Brady
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Hensel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Krista Hogarth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Motta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sanda Petrut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cherry + Lyndsay Cavanagh3257% games+11.9% vs expected
Krista Hogarth + Selma Bouhl6260% games+0.6% vs expected
Dina DeLaurentis + Susan Schierl Sullivan7647% games−0.2% vs expected
Anna Swanson + Selma Bouhl7647% games−1.1% vs expected
Sanda Petrut + Selma Bouhl10264% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Vahey + Susan Schierl Sullivan9062% gamesnot enough data
Anna Swanson + Susan Schierl Sullivan4346% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Brady + Susan Schierl Sullivan6159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Ford
76W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Lyndsay Cavanagh
126W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Sherry Polachek
138W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Michelle Yuen
51W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Jessica Vahey
41W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Erin Baker
21W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hannah Alphs Jackson
44W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Cherry
59W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Katie Boyle
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Anna Swanson
78W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Selma Bouhl
82W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Susan Schierl Sullivan
101W–97L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Julianne Hartzell
95W–85L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Dina DeLaurentis
53W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Lauren Traficanto
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Jamie Brady
30W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jane Hensel
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Clark
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Krista Hogarth
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Motta
35W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sanda Petrut
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.