Teams

WALLENBERG PK CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2025-11-01vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5GWon 10
W#1 DoublesGen Yamamoto / Benjamin Pool vs Jackie Ching / He Lu6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-31vs BRAMHALL PK CM7.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesBalachandra Rangaswamy / Chad Tenturier vs Joseph Huang / Nan Sun5-7, 1-6
2025-10-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFateh Mammadov / Laxman Subramanian vs Jason Castillo / Chris Smith3-6, 5-7
2025-10-25vs SILVER CREEK CM7.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesKumar Kandaswamy / Chad Tenturier vs Rohit Sharma / Rodley Fabie1-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs LOS PASEOS PK CM7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBalachandra Rangaswamy / Chad Tenturier vs Quocbao Lenguyen / Art Biagtan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-18vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5FWon 10
W#1 DoublesMahesh Narayanan / Benjamin Pool vs Xiao Chen / Peng Xi6-2, 7-6
2025-10-05vs LOS GATOS SR CM7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLaxman Subramanian / Ram Subramanian vs Cameron Bill / Bryan Evans4-6, 4-6
2025-09-27vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CM7.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesKang Chen / Chad Tenturier vs Imran Hashim / Seongsik Chang6-2, 6-3
2025-09-27vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKang Chen / Sudipta Biswas vs Zehao Qin / Zihao Zhou6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs FOOTHILLS TandS CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Ewing / Paul Kwon vs Dominic Borie / Huan Ren6-1, 6-1
2025-09-20vs RINCONADA PK CM7.5DWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanny Miranda / Paul Kwon vs Zihao Zhou / Zehao Qin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShang Liu / Reiji Hirayama vs Bowen She / Gary Chen6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5GWon 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Low / Paul Kwon vs Sharad Santhanam / Jing Wang6-0, 6-4
2025-09-11vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5FWon 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Low / Paul Kwon vs Wenxin He / Tao Huang6-2, 6-4
2025-09-06vs MORGAN HILL TC CM7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBalachandra Rangaswamy / Laxman Subramanian vs David Tran / Elliott Do5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-31vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CM7.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMuralidharan Jayavelan / Chad Tenturier vs Lawrence Roseman / Sanjay Vadlamani6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaxman Subramanian / Natarajan Choodamani vs Robert Gosalvez / Samuel Varghese6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Natarajan Choodamani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Daniel Kroes
published 4
3.89
3.88
Vladan Popovic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Jiajie Li
published
3.86
Abhinav Rana
published 4
3.83
Fateh Mammadov
published 4
3.82
Kang Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Muralidharan Jayavelan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Ram Subramanian
published
3.63
Paul Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Avinash Viswanathan
published 3.5
3.61
Devank Agarwal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Kumar Kandaswamy
published
3.53
Chad Tenturier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.53
Benjamin Pool
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Reiji Hirayama
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Laxman Subramanian
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laxman Subramanian + Chad Tenturier7264% games+5.1% vs expected
Benjamin Pool + Chad Tenturier303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natarajan Choodamani
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Balachandra Rangaswamy
33W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Vladan Popovic
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Jiajie Li
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Abhinav Rana
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Fateh Mammadov
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Kang Chen
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Muralidharan Jayavelan
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Ram Subramanian
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Paul Kwon
23W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Avinash Viswanathan
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Devank Agarwal
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Kumar Kandaswamy
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Chad Tenturier
65W–27L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Benjamin Pool
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Reiji Hirayama
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Laxman Subramanian
120W–52L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.