Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Utgaard

2022 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 4.5W

19 players · average NTRP 4.20 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Laura Savage
published
4.43
Kimberly Simpson
published
4.35
Stephanie Tonin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Amy Woolley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christina Mooney
published 4.5
4.23
Tracey Valentine
published
4.17
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Olivia Hu
published
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.88
Kristi Roggensack
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Dorene Sambado
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Renee Utgaard
published 4
3.60
Elaine Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Miglena Aaron
published
Cynthia Petersen
published
Jill Jensen Clark
published
LIZ CARLSON
published
Lisa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Tonin + Tracey Valentine9074% games+11.2% vs expected
Amy Woolley + Kalee King9061% games+9.0% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Kimberly Simpson19960% games+7.1% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Laura Savage6165% games+5.2% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Tracey Valentine10359% games+3.4% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Laura Savage6356% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Arashan Heikkila30663% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Savage
116W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
Kimberly Simpson
144W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Stephanie Tonin
159W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Christina Mooney
60W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Valentine
97W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Elaine Thornton
16W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Miglena Aaron
39W–51L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Cynthia Petersen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Jensen Clark
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
LIZ CARLSON
45W–50L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Garland
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.