Teams

CDTA E 55&OM7.0 2Tam Woods Sun 11 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesShawn Erickson / Hiren Patel vs Richard Rykhus / Matthew Pothast6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWaldemar Dyjewski / Matt Newman vs Richard Morton / Joe Morton6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHoward Gartzman / Ed Duffy vs Michael Eighan / Matthew Newman6-1, 6-5
W#1 DoublesShawn Erickson / Howard Gartzman vs Keith Giltner / Ron Netzel1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWaldemar Dyjewski / Larry GOLD vs Jeffrey Porto / David MacK6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHarold Krent / William James vs Doug Sink / James Jones6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesShawn Erickson / Hiren Patel vs Richard McLean / Bob King6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Wellems / Waldemar Dyjewski vs James McTeague / Chuck Narunatvanich6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJohn van Duzer / John Randazzo vs Hunter Wiggins / Eric Esancy2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesEd Duffy / Shawn Erickson vs Scott Smith / Thomas Stotter6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLarry GOLD / Imran Ghiasuddin vs John Stuparitz / Ronald Schwartz6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesClyde Woods / Michael Wellems vs Richard Foss / Brian Hagaman6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMatt Newman / Shawn Erickson vs Joseph Lyden / Naresh Koka6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWaldemar Dyjewski / Clyde Woods vs John Compton / Scott Williamson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHoward Gartzman / William James vs Barry Gork / Michael Smith6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesEd Duffy / Hiren Patel vs Michael Denne / Chakaris London6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWaldemar Dyjewski / John Randazzo vs Andrew Pappas / Arnold Villagomez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn van Duzer / Harold Krent vs Darryl Lewis / Paul Leonardo6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OM7.0 2Tam Woods Sun 11 $22601625111
2CDTA E 55&OM7.0 7Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $2451153897
3CDTA E 55&OM7.0 3Tam Robbie Sat 3 $224281024164
4CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $203310817121
5CDTA E 55&OM7.0 4HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $221551326173
6CDTA E 55&OM7.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.51551327174
7CDTA E 55&OM7.0 6MTB Castriano Sat 4 $271541429180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Harold Krent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Howard Gartzman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Shawn Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Michael Wellems
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Ed Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Hiren Patel
published 3.5
Imran Ghiasuddin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
John Randazzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Clyde Woods
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
John van Duzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Newman
published
Waldemar Dyjewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John van Duzer + Harold Krent7264% gamesnot enough data
Michael Wellems + Howard Gartzman6353% gamesnot enough data
Clyde Woods + Harold Krent6177% gamesnot enough data
Howard Gartzman + Ed Duffy404 matchesnot enough data
Howard Gartzman + Clyde Woods314 matchesnot enough data
Waldemar Dyjewski + Clyde Woods033 matchesnot enough data
Michael Wellems + John Randazzo213 matchesnot enough data
Ed Duffy + Clyde Woods213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Harold Krent
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Howard Gartzman
148W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
Shawn Erickson
52W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Michael Wellems
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ed Duffy
44W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Hiren Patel
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Imran Ghiasuddin
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Randazzo
64W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Clyde Woods
58W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
John van Duzer
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Newman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Waldemar Dyjewski
18W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.