Teams

CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesPhil Frederickson / Neal Johnson vs Robert Wheeler III / Gustavo Rodriguez4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Porto / David MacK vs Hunter Wiggins / James McTeague5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Sink / Robert Senft vs Richard McLean / Sean Conboy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Porto / Phil Debuhr vs Richard Rykhus / Joe Morton2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Giltner / Phil Frederickson vs Michael Eighan / Ward Wittmeyer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid MacK / Ron Netzel vs Marc Pelini / Jim Fine3-6, 2-4
L#1 DoublesKeith Giltner / Ron Netzel vs Shawn Erickson / Howard Gartzman6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Porto / David MacK vs Waldemar Dyjewski / Larry GOLD4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Sink / James Jones vs Harold Krent / William James3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesPete Karamitsos / Chris Gair vs Craig Sieben / John Compton6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Jones / Dave Carlquist vs Scott Williamson / Bud Stephani6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Senft / Phil Debuhr vs Barry Gork / Gerald Gallagher6-1, 6-1
2025-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Barry / Dave Carlquist vs Michael Denne - * / Arnold Villagomez - *6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDave Carlquist / Robert Barry vs William Strickley / Ronald Schwartz6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNeal Johnson / Phil Debuhr vs Richard Foss / John Stuparitz7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OM7.0 2Tam Woods Sun 11 $22601625111
2CDTA E 55&OM7.0 7Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $2451153897
3CDTA E 55&OM7.0 3Tam Robbie Sat 3 $224281024164
4CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $203310817121
5CDTA E 55&OM7.0 4HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $221551326173
6CDTA E 55&OM7.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.51551327174
7CDTA E 55&OM7.0 6MTB Castriano Sat 4 $271541429180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jeffrey Porto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Dave Carlquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
David MacK
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Ron Netzel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Keith Mills
published
2.83
Chris Gair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Doug Sink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Keith Giltner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Neal Johnson
published
Phil Debuhr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Phil Frederickson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Barry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Senft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David MacK + Jeffrey Porto252252% games+1.0% vs expected
Ron Netzel + Phil Frederickson1736% games−6.9% vs expected
Ron Netzel + Keith Mills1738% games−7.0% vs expected
Keith Giltner + Chris Gair9851% gamesnot enough data
Phil Debuhr + Keith Mills10553% gamesnot enough data
Phil Debuhr + Robert Senft5946% gamesnot enough data
Dave Carlquist + Robert Barry9554% gamesnot enough data
Phil Debuhr + Robert Barry5849% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeffrey Porto
135W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Dave Carlquist
75W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
David MacK
90W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Ron Netzel
13W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Keith Mills
47W–81L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Chris Gair
50W–86L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Doug Sink
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Giltner
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Neal Johnson
20W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Phil Debuhr
63W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Phil Frederickson
24W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Barry
59W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Senft
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.