Teams

CDTA E 55&OM7.0 7Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $24

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichael LeBaron / Gitanas Indreika vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRick Jett / Rocky Colletti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRobert Wheeler III / Gustavo Rodriguez vs Phil Frederickson / Neal Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHunter Wiggins / James McTeague vs Jeffrey Porto / David MacK7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard McLean / Sean Conboy vs Doug Sink / Robert Senft6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRichard McLean / Bob King vs Shawn Erickson / Hiren Patel4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames McTeague / Chuck Narunatvanich vs Michael Wellems / Waldemar Dyjewski4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHunter Wiggins / Eric Esancy vs John van Duzer / John Randazzo6-2, 6-3
2025-11-11Won 30
W#1 DoublesHunter Wiggins / Barry Dauber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChuck Narunatvanich / Bob King vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJames McTeague / Eric Esancy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRobert Wheeler III / Gustavo Rodriguez vs Craig Sieben / Scott Williamson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRocky Colletti / William Laheta vs John Compton / Michael Smith7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesRobert Wheeler III / Gustavo Rodriguez vs Richard Morton / Matthew Pothast6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Jett / Gitanas Indreika vs James Albertone / Mike Lyman6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSean Conboy / Michael LeBaron vs Michael Eighan / Randy Robbie6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OM7.0 2Tam Woods Sun 11 $22601625111
2CDTA E 55&OM7.0 7Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $2451153897
3CDTA E 55&OM7.0 3Tam Robbie Sat 3 $224281024164
4CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $203310817121
5CDTA E 55&OM7.0 4HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $221551326173
6CDTA E 55&OM7.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.51551327174
7CDTA E 55&OM7.0 6MTB Castriano Sat 4 $271541429180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Robert Wheeler III
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Hunter Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Michael LeBaron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Barry Dauber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Rick Jett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
James McTeague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Sean Conboy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Chuck Narunatvanich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bob King
published 3.5
3.23
Rocky Colletti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gitanas Indreika
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.76
Eric Esancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Richard McLean
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Siva Jagadeesan
published
William Laheta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hunter Wiggins + Sean Conboy12364% games+8.0% vs expected
Sean Conboy + Eric Esancy4446% games+4.5% vs expected
Rocky Colletti + Richard McLean10264% games+4.0% vs expected
Barry Dauber + Sean Conboy101154% games+3.7% vs expected
Barry Dauber + Hunter Wiggins18758% games+3.5% vs expected
Bob King + Eric Esancy13462% games+3.1% vs expected
Gitanas Indreika + Rick Jett14460% games+1.8% vs expected
Rocky Colletti + Rick Jett22564% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Wheeler III
48W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Hunter Wiggins
72W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Michael LeBaron
38W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Barry Dauber
110W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Rick Jett
127W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
James McTeague
66W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Sean Conboy
105W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Chuck Narunatvanich
53W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bob King
63W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Rocky Colletti
103W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gitanas Indreika
37W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Eric Esancy
154W–187L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Richard McLean
153W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Siva Jagadeesan
8W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Laheta
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.