Teams

CDTA E 55&OM7.0 4HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesGregory Franzo / Michael Roth vs Patrick Casey / John Compton4-6, 4-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Bonds / Darryl Lewis vs Don Duszynski / Barry Gork6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMichael Roth / Andrew Pappas vs Mike Lyman / Ward Wittmeyer7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGregory Franzo / Darryl Lewis vs Chris Goedde / Matthew Pothast2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Michael Roth vs Thomas Stotter / Ronald Schwartz7-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesGregory Franzo / Michael Denne vs Brian Hagaman / William Strickley6-2, 6-2
2025-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Barry / Dave Carlquist vs Michael Denne - * / Arnold Villagomez - *6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMichael Denne / Chakaris London vs Ed Duffy / Hiren Patel1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Arnold Villagomez vs Waldemar Dyjewski / John Randazzo1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDarryl Lewis / Paul Leonardo vs John van Duzer / Harold Krent1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OM7.0 2Tam Woods Sun 11 $22601625111
2CDTA E 55&OM7.0 7Naper Esancy Sun 6:30 $2451153897
3CDTA E 55&OM7.0 3Tam Robbie Sat 3 $224281024164
4CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $203310817121
5CDTA E 55&OM7.0 4HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $221551326173
6CDTA E 55&OM7.0 1MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.51551327174
7CDTA E 55&OM7.0 6MTB Castriano Sat 4 $271541429180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Paul Leonardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Brian Bonds
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Michael Denne
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Andrew Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dwight Janzen
published 3.5
3.20
Michael Roth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Darryl Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Chakaris London
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Arnold Villagomez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Gregory Franzo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Roth + Dwight Janzen121646% games−5.0% vs expected
Michael Denne + Brian Bonds7070% gamesnot enough data
Michael Denne + Chakaris London4347% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leonardo + Darryl Lewis314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Pappas + Michael Roth224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Bonds + Darryl Lewis224 matchesnot enough data
Dwight Janzen + Chakaris London314 matchesnot enough data
Arnold Villagomez + Michael Denne303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Leonardo
91W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Brian Bonds
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Michael Denne
157W–102L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Andrew Pappas
142W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dwight Janzen
82W–143L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Roth
112W–181L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Darryl Lewis
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Chakaris London
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Arnold Villagomez
25W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Gregory Franzo
108W–133L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.