Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-21vs Ogden-AndersenLost 01
L#2 SinglesKathi Poggi vs Lindsay Andersen3-6, 2-6
2024-05-14vs Salt Lake Tennis-Harmon/SwalbergWon 20
W#2 DoublesLindy Parks / Shayna Dickey vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Lindsey Williams6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKathi Poggi vs Nooshin Prasthofer6-0, 6-1
2024-05-03Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Trentman / Kathi Poggi vs Lexi Farr / Kelly Wilcox6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKrissie Summerhays / Lindy Parks vs Karlene Johnston / Michelle Lynn Maxfield5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-16vs Sunpro-Fowkes/ParkerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathi Poggi / Sara Ray vs Ashley Bailey / Jane Stay2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Alexa Saltzman
usually #1 Singles 65%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 4
3.54
Katie Leikin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.38
Sara Ray
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Ann Trentman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Madelyn Totland
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Terri Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.14
Lindy Parks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathi Poggi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Shelly Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.77
Krissie Summerhays
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.73
Porsche Gardner
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shayna Dickey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tracee Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ewing + Katie Leikin2452% games+10.0% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+8.5% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Sara Ray3260% games+7.9% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+5.2% vs expected
Nicole Fisher + Maria Pettit5160% games+5.0% vs expected
Shayna Dickey + Lindy Parks5155% games+4.5% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.0% vs expected
Madelyn Totland + Katie Leikin11954% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexa Saltzman
126W–65L career · 17 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Katie Leikin
103W–125L career · 10 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
Sara Ray
88W–102L career · 11 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ann Trentman
185W–245L career · 16 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Madelyn Totland
36W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 12 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Terri Brunner
141W–141L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lindy Parks
120W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Shelly Kemp
137W–133L career · 7 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 10 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Krissie Summerhays
109W–122L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Porsche Gardner
33W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Nicole Fisher
100W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shayna Dickey
22W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
38W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.