Teams

PowerHouse

2025 Tri Level League · M3.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.05 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-13vs Liberty Park-Bublik/VosWon 21
W#1 DoublesArthur Miyazaki / Brayden Blodgett vs Peter Bublik / David Novom6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Bleak / Ryan Hiller vs Devin Liljenquist / David Gustafson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Inouye / Jaeden Harris vs Brent Li / Austin Aguinaga2-6, 3-6
2025-10-05vs Liberty Park-Bublik/VosLost 12
L#1 DoublesKingsley Hoang / Ryan Hiller vs Peter Bublik / Jonathan Brown2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChris Bleak / Derek Nielson vs Jared Christensen / Devin Liljenquist7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGabriel Tapia / Jaeden Harris vs Edward Ekstrom / Brent Li3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-04vs Southpaw DaddiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesCooper Jenkins / Benson Goates vs Tony Lew / Andres J J Gonzalez Roa6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJake Johnson / Ryan Hiller vs Brady Rasmussen / Don Tran3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Isaza / David Ludlow vs Hudson Martin / Alexander Li2-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs Southpaw DaddiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesCooper Jenkins / Kingsley Hoang vs Andres J J Gonzalez Roa / Bode Widerburg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Nielson / Jake Johnson vs Remi Barron / Don Tran6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Isaza / Gabriel Tapia vs Garrett Snyder / Keith Gwilliam3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · M3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southpaw Daddies226613113
2Liberty Park-Bublik/Vos226613117
3PowerHouse226616128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Brayden Blodgett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Benson Goates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cooper Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Arthur Miyazaki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Chris Bleak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Ryan Hiller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Derek Nielson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jake Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Daniel Inouye
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Jaeden Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Gabriel Tapia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Isaza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
David Ludlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kingsley Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Hiller + Chris Bleak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brayden Blodgett
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Benson Goates
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cooper Jenkins
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Arthur Miyazaki
126W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Chris Bleak
159W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Ryan Hiller
45W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Derek Nielson
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Jake Johnson
175W–131L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Daniel Inouye
37W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Jaeden Harris
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Gabriel Tapia
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Michael Isaza
142W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
David Ludlow
135W–127L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kingsley Hoang
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.