← Teams

MAC-Graham

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Rodrigo Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
James Hockley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Kim Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
James Ringelberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Tom Sloan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Nina Sanna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2018-12-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Tom Sloan vs Maddie Karpinski / Peter Brown6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Aguilar / Christian Buchholz vs Steven Wilker / Antoinette Ann Reno6-4, 6-3
2018-12-01Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Rodrigo Aguilar vs Honghui Liang / Hongsheng Lin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Sterling / Tom Sloan vs Bin He / Frank Shen7-6, 6-2
2018-11-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNina Sanna / James Ringelberg vs Heidi Wilcox / David Pham3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Leeding / James Hockley vs Donna Kennish / Agus Rusli6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Rodrigo Aguilar vs Maria Kosmetatos / Vincent Lee6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2018-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Nina Sanna vs Johnny Ung / Lindsey Kahler7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Deb Garris vs James Feeney / Melissa Light6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Sloan / Sally Sterling vs Bjorn Morfin / Shamarra Jackson6-0, 6-2
2018-10-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Rudy Martinez vs Rebecca Redding / Adam Brundage7-5, 6-2
2018-09-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrian Jones / Nina Sanna vs Misty Bettis / Frank Olson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRudy Martinez / Dana Hunt vs Rebecca Delambert / Thomas Lockhart6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristopher Graham / Kim Stevens vs Marje Ferek / Robert Ferek7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2018-09-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristopher Graham / Kim Stevens vs Maddie Karpinski / Soren Coughlin-Glaser7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRudy Martinez / Dana Hunt vs Adam Rothert / Rebecca Martinez Griffin6-4, 6-3
2018-09-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTom Sloan / Sally Sterling vs Julie Carmena / Daniel Lamey6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Hunt / Rudy Martinez vs Gregory Conn / Linda Conn1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Hockley / Kim Stevens vs Ginny Nichols / John Nichols6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Rodrigo Aguilar
37W–36L career
38%62%0%
3.93
4
James Hockley
31W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
James Ringelberg
73W–77L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57
3.5
Tom Sloan
65W–40L career
0%94%5%
3.36
3.5
Nina Sanna
13W–39L career · type S
10%86%4%
3.23
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.