← Search

James Hockley

Portland, OR
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
54 matches · 31W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Hockley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
N/A
2026-04-30 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-18 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-23 · N OR-MAC-Helmer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-05-16 · N OR-MAC-Helmer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-10-28 · N OR-MAC-Turnbull · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-09-23 · N OR-MAC-Turnbull · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Hergenhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-11-12 · MAC-Graham · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rudy Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-09-24 · MAC-Graham · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2022-09-17 · MAC-Graham · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-06-11 · MAC-Herbst/Conyard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Posewitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-05-22 · MAC-Herbst/Conyard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2022-05-07 · MAC-Herbst/Conyard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.2% of games
8.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 54.1% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe