Search

Rick Collins

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 14W–46L · seasons 20192025
Where Rick sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Rick is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams28 teams · 2001–2025
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
CAC-Morales
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
THPRD-Soiffer
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
LOTC-Lee/Hasle
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rick has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rick has gone from the 9th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
24.2%
8W–25L · 39.3% of games
8.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.6% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
Logan Corcoran / Richard Kelly
2025-06-22 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Baer
+0.044better than expected — took 68% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-14 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Donnelly
0.031below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-06-01 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Adams
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Logan Corcoran / Benson Chong
2025-05-11 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Adams
+0.070better than expected — took 71% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-03 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Warren Hill
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ty Hendrickson / Nate Ford
2025-03-29 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ernie Levenson
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-03-16 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Adams
+0.015better than expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-02-15 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Adams
+0.021about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-01-26 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Sheridan
0.011below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
William Hergenhan / Julian Illingworth
2025-01-19 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Sheridan
+0.039better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-01 · LOTC-Lee/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bret Kean
0.032below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-05-02 · CAC-Morales · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Truc Ly
0.027below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.