Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-19vs TRILOGY 55MX7.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Rascle / Tom Betts vs Vicki Moran / Tim Moran6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKris Courtney / Jan Davel vs Lydia Reoutt / Paul Schapira6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBecky Reiss / Greg Kalustian vs Anna Silva / Glenn Oribello6-2, 6-2
2025-08-26vs TRILOGY 55MX7.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Rivera / Tom Betts vs Christina T Michelsen / Tim Moran6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Law / David Wax vs Vicki Moran / Fred Almgren2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKris Courtney / Jan Davel vs Susan Wood / Scott Wood3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Becky Reiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Karl Brown
published
3.29
Jan Davel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Arlene Acosta
published 3.5
Christine Meng
published 3.5
3.23
Tom Betts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Patrick Wu
published
3.21
Stephanie Law
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Daniel Bao
published 3.5
3.14
Kris Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Ellen Leng
published 3.5
3.08
David Wax
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Marilyn Pellouchoud
published
2.97
Greg Kalustian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Chris Rascle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
John Bockman
published
2.69
Jonathan Degg
published
Margaret Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Akli
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Reiss
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Karl Brown
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jan Davel
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Arlene Acosta
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Christine Meng
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Betts
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Patrick Wu
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Stephanie Law
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Daniel Bao
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Kris Courtney
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Ellen Leng
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
David Wax
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Marilyn Pellouchoud
6W–25L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Greg Kalustian
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Chris Rascle
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
John Bockman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jonathan Degg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Margaret Rivera
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.