Teams

Hit That

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Julia Henry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Christina Bergstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Roxanna Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Julia Henry vs Kathleen Crowley / Katja Daoud6-3, 7-6
2024-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Roxanna Johnson vs Cindy Bennett / Anastasiya Vinokur6-1, 7-5
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Christina Bergstrom vs Anita Heredia / Geri Marcus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Christina Bergstrom vs Elizabeth Arwood / Alexis Nelson Knapp6-2, 7-5
2024-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Julia Henry vs Thao Nguyen / Michelle Cortez6-1, 7-6
2024-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Julia Henry vs Margaret Jacobsen / Clare Belott6-0, 6-2
2024-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Julia Henry vs Sarah Sasek / Allison Ferre6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3
Christina Bergstrom
67W–50L career
0%76%24%
2.97
3
Roxanna Johnson
114W–65L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.