Teams

Lowman 18s 3.5 Piedmont

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-16vs Pate 18s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKimberly Gay vs Jordan Hedrick6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-04-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesKimberly Gay vs Gracie Womack6-0, 6-0
2022-03-28vs Nundkumar 18s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Janet Fortney vs Tammy Kasik / Sara Nundkumar5-7, 1-6
2022-03-21vs Dulin 18s 3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesKimberly Gay vs Stacey Russo6-4, 6-0
2022-03-07vs Bettinger/Kraska 18s 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Fortney / Kimberly Gay vs Niddy Corrias / Lindsay Olin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Leigh Abraham
published
3.57
Kimberly Gay
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Mary Beth Hartman
published
3.37
Julia Barnes
published
3.26
Courtney Penley
published 4
Brandi Jacques
published 3.5
Jamie Stoffel
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Lowman
published
3.13
Kelly Rike
published
3.12
Amber Trbonja
published 3.5
2.95
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lowman + Amber Trbonja1733% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Kimberly Gay
376W–167L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
Mary Beth Hartman
91W–66L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
4
Courtney Penley
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jamie Stoffel
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Lowman
43W–46L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Rike
8W–21L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amber Trbonja
11W–34L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.