Teams

40-Love-LaRosa

2021 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-07vs Mid Court CrisisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill LaRosa / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Lissa Dashe / Lisa Foisy7-5, 3-0
2021-08-04vs Krammer-ZhangWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill LaRosa / Mara White vs Savitha Krammer / Lucy Zhang1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-07-29vs RO 2.5 Women's TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill LaRosa / Mara White vs Virginia Onu / Irina Salvan6-3, 6-1
2021-07-25vs Krammer-ZhangWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill LaRosa / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Savitha Krammer / Lucy Zhang6-2, 7-6
2021-07-18vs Mid Court CrisisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill LaRosa / Elisabeth Newkirk vs Annie Fanberg / Lisa Foisy4-6, 4-6
2021-06-21vs Wi/ZiWon 10
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Newkirk / Mara White vs Allison Zike / Kelly Wilkinson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Elisabeth Newkirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Mara White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jill LaRosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill LaRosa + Elisabeth Newkirk17266% games+9.3% vs expected
Mara White + Jill LaRosa101051% games−2.4% vs expected
Mara White + Elisabeth Newkirk314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisabeth Newkirk
126W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3
Mara White
112W–92L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Jill LaRosa
139W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.