Teams

Fr.Harris40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-07vs Ca.Garrett40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Cathy Marion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Black / Casey Novak vs Erin Bailey / Leah Beatty6-3, 6-0
2023-09-30vs Ka.Wahle40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Cathy Marion vs Karen Wahle / Shannon Sikes1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMindy Hamlin / Casey Novak vs Julendia Gaillard / Anna Kethey4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-23vs Sa.Highsmith40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Shelton / Jill Wolborsky vs Kristen Patch / Sally Highsmith2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Cathy Marion vs Katherine Teague / Stephanie Sneeden7-5, 7-5
2023-09-20vs Ca.Langlois40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Linda Nuxoll vs Michele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Novak / Cathy Marion vs Catherine Langlois / Michele Gan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Megan Black vs Teri Wallace / Elizabeth Pavese6-3, 6-2
2023-08-26vs Ja.Bossert40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Linda Nuxoll vs Allison Dugan / AMY KOCH6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFran Harris / Casey Novak vs Jessica Tyndall / Margaret Barham4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Wolborsky / Stephanie Williams vs Deborah Brantley / Kathryn Barton2-2
2023-08-12vs Er.Oliver40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Shelton / Casey Novak vs Brandy Vannoy / Nina Schweitzer2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Marion / Catherine Wilborne vs Erica Oliver / Kelly Hurter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-05vs Je.Komes40C2.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMindy Hamlin / Jill Wolborsky vs Valerie Clowes / Kathan Griscik0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasey Novak / Megan Black vs Lanier McRee / Kristen Duke3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Catherine Wilborne
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Linda Nuxoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cathy Marion
published 3
2.74
Amanda Shelton
published 3
2.70
Erin Maher
published 3
2.68
Casey Novak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Elisabeth Nixon
published 3
2.25
Jill Wolborsky
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Mindy Hamlin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Wilborne
57W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Linda Nuxoll
70W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Cathy Marion
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amanda Shelton
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Erin Maher
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Casey Novak
114W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
Jill Wolborsky
41W–101L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Mindy Hamlin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.