Teams

IKJohnson

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-02vs JRowleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Christina Loaiza vs Christine Reinke / Jamie Middledorf6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-26vs ICShawWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Wood / Chunhui Higgins vs Mary Cockrill / Luann Richardson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-05vs AWillard18+TRIWon 10
W#1 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Sandy Wood vs Laurie Randall / Debbie O'Rourke6-2, 7-6
2022-06-28vs MLAPLANTELost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Wood / Nannette Goodwin vs Ginger Sluder / Lynne Manweiler4-6, 6-7
2022-06-21vs ASheehanWon 10
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Christina Loaiza vs Lucy Holding / Elisabeth Sanchez6-2, 6-3
2022-06-14vs DSKIKOWon 10
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Chunhui Higgins vs Ann Bowler / Aileen Carroll6-4, 6-2
2022-06-07vs DDriscollWon 10
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Christina Loaiza vs Susan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Chunhui Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Laura McNiven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Nannette Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Christina Loaiza
published 4
3.62
Caroline Fungaroli
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Sandy Wood
published
3.40
Meike Schacht
published
3.38
Wendy Lindberg
published
3.33
Deanna Lape
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Tobi Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Phyllis Soltz
published
3.09
Amy Merdes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Debbie Castiller
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McNiven + Nannette Goodwin6259% games−0.0% vs expected
Tobi Buckley + Amy Merdes12852% games−3.8% vs expected
Tobi Buckley + Chunhui Higgins8161% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Lape + Laura McNiven6364% gamesnot enough data
Amy Merdes + Chunhui Higgins7171% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Fungaroli + Debbie Castiller6255% gamesnot enough data
Tobi Buckley + Caroline Fungaroli5260% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Nannette Goodwin5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chunhui Higgins
232W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Laura McNiven
352W–122L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–205L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Christina Loaiza
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Caroline Fungaroli
185W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
Sandy Wood
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Meike Schacht
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Wendy Lindberg
42W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Deanna Lape
142W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Tobi Buckley
148W–125L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Phyllis Soltz
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Merdes
90W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Debbie Castiller
189W–106L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.