Teams

ICShaw

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-26vs IKJohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Cockrill / Luann Richardson vs Sandy Wood / Chunhui Higgins6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Kimberly Durland vs Kim Johnson / Deanna Lape2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGinny Meier / Marlea Ward vs Wendy Lindberg / Debbie Castiller7-5, 7-6
2022-07-19vs RMann Tri Level 2022Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Jolyne Taylor vs Tracy Morris / Vicky Arne1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Durland / Cornelia Shaw vs Takako Schenberger / Christine Subasic7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIngrid Holscher / Marlea Ward vs Ange Urlaub / Julie Karg6-2, 7-5
2022-07-12vs AWillard18+TRIWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Penn Lunger / Karen Gupton vs Regina Heroux / Sherrie Smith2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRachel Brown / Cornelia Shaw vs Pamela Pitre / Ann Willard6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGinny Meier / Marlea Ward vs Jade Paunovich / Harriet Volpe6-1, 6-0
2022-07-07vs MLAPLANTEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Cockrill / Jolyne Taylor vs Erika Atkinson / Ginger Sluder2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Durland / Mary Penn Lunger vs Susanne Knowles / Maggie LaPlante6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Lyle / Ginny Meier vs Sarah Glover / Jeanette Gerould7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-28vs ASheehanLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Cockrill / Jolyne Taylor vs Lucy Holding / Amanda Williams6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Brown / Cornelia Shaw vs Allison Sheehan / Melanie Tharrington2-6, 3-6
2022-06-21vs DSKIKOLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson vs Aileen Carroll / Deb Skiko1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Cockrill / Cornelia Shaw vs Helen Harris / Holly Moravec1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGinny Meier / Liz Woodall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-14vs DDriscollLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Penn Lunger / Mary Cockrill vs Kathryn Beth Beam / Susan Flanagan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Rachel Brown vs LUCY LAV / Susie EL-Kaissi1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGinny Meier / Marlea Ward vs Stacey Giglio / Marilyn Slaymaker0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-07vs JRowleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJolyne Taylor / Holly Camak vs Allyson Schneider / Jamie Middledorf7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Mary Penn Lunger vs Karen Reynders / Cindi Peterson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Ginny Meier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Rachel Brown
published
3.58
Mary Penn Lunger
published
3.51
Jolyne Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Luann Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.27
Kimberly Durland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Cockrill
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Teressa Paschaloudis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Ingrid Holscher
published 3.5
2.98
Karen Gupton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Cornelia Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Marlea Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luann Richardson + Marlea Ward6258% games+6.8% vs expected
Teressa Paschaloudis + Cornelia Shaw51441% games+3.1% vs expected
Holly Camak + Jolyne Taylor14459% games+2.2% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Teressa Paschaloudis253547% games+0.9% vs expected
Mary Cockrill + Jolyne Taylor6447% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cockrill + Luann Richardson3445% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cockrill + Karen Gupton0623% gamesnot enough data
Luann Richardson + Karen Gupton2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ginny Meier
230W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
4.16
Rachel Brown
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Mary Penn Lunger
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jolyne Taylor
140W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Luann Richardson
83W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–190L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Mary Cockrill
61W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Teressa Paschaloudis
56W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ingrid Holscher
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Karen Gupton
63W–125L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Cornelia Shaw
34W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Marlea Ward
60W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.