Teams

Racketeers

USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 4.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rachel Moorhead vs Robyn Roby / Anthony Hunt3-6, 3-6
2022-04-03vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesGina Sharp / Jeff Buckingham vs Rick Roby / Theresa Haskell7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Wallace Eastwood / Luciana Hall7-5, 6-4
2022-03-20vs PTSA 9.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Jacob Sessions / Maria Tangarife6-3, 6-2
2022-03-12vs Jo-Ker's ReturnWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Jody Mallane / Sam Elsethagen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-05vs PTSA 9.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Pratap Murali / Suzanna Murali3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Dan Buckingham
published 5
4.53
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.47
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
4.37
Rachel Moorhead
published 4.5
4.29
Kimbell Gourley
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
published 4
3.71
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
Jeff Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Michael Harvey
published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Dan Buckingham9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Dan Buckingham21656% games+2.9% vs expected
Dawna Buckingham + Dan Buckingham15955% games+2.5% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Rilee Moorhead5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham282253% gamesnot enough data
Dawna Buckingham + Jeff Buckingham61246% gamesnot enough data
Maryann Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham21037% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
128W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.88
4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Rachel Moorhead
49W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Kimbell Gourley
36W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jeff Buckingham
50W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Michael Harvey
216W–85L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.