Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Bernard/Sterbenz

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-01Split 11
W#1 SinglesNittaya Phonharath vs Ashley Park6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesHeather Stokes vs Karin Smith6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHeather Stokes vs Marinn Patch2-6, 4-6
2024-05-16vs Liberty Park Tennis-Kemp/WallaceSplit 22
W#1 SinglesHeather Stokes vs Anna Kemp7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNittaya Phonharath / Casey Pickett vs Lora Cobabe / Kathy Miller-Rees4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMcKelle Burnett vs Morgan Behymer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllessandra Harris / Massae Sato MacIunas vs Baylee Coleman / Olivia Hu6-7, 3-6
2024-05-14vs Wasatch Hills-Luu/ParryWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Blake / Virginia Brodd vs Alexandria Keith / Victoria Lara7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHeather Stokes vs MacI Amussen7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Sterbenz / Nittaya Phonharath vs LIZ CARLSON / Christina Mooney6-1, 6-2
2024-05-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNittaya Phonharath / Miranda Edwards vs Brook Vietor / Jennifer Korb4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMcKelle Burnett / Sarah Blake vs Ashley Park / Karin Smith6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAllessandra Harris vs Britney Klaetsch2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Brodd / Sarah Blake vs Jane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNittaya Phonharath vs Cyndi Jones7-5, 6-1
2024-04-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-Kemp/WallaceWon 21
L#1 SinglesAllessandra Harris vs Morgan Behymer5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHeather Stokes vs Baylee Coleman6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlessandra Nolan / Nittaya Phonharath vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Michelle Moscon6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lisa Sterbenz
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.30
Patrice Duvernay
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 4.5
Allessandra Harris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Casey Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Alessandra Nolan
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.06
Nittaya Phonharath
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
4.00
Tracey Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.92
Miranda Edwards
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Massae Sato MacIunas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Heather Stokes
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Leslie Barrowes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
McKelle Burnett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Blake
published
Virginia Brodd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sterbenz + Patrice Duvernay4650% games+5.7% vs expected
Tracey Valentine + Patrice Duvernay31961% games+5.4% vs expected
Lisa Sterbenz + Casey Pickett16855% games+0.2% vs expected
Massae Sato MacIunas + Lisa Sterbenz1546% games−6.6% vs expected
Massae Sato MacIunas + Leslie Barrowes033 matchesnot enough data
Massae Sato MacIunas + Tracey Valentine033 matchesnot enough data
Massae Sato MacIunas + Patrice Duvernay123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Stokes + Tracey Valentine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Sterbenz
151W–143L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Patrice Duvernay
141W–72L career · 13 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Allessandra Harris
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–133L career · 8 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Alessandra Nolan
93W–60L career · 11 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Nittaya Phonharath
72W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Tracey Valentine
95W–60L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Miranda Edwards
45W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Massae Sato MacIunas
106W–120L career · 14 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Heather Stokes
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Barrowes
26W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
McKelle Burnett
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Blake
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Brodd
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.