Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury/Miller

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-30vs Sports Mall-Widerburg/VietorLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Sue Curtis vs Susan Picou / Maribel Alvarez3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann vs Lisa Sterbenz / Casey Pickett6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMarinn Patch vs Heather Stokes6-2, 6-4
2024-05-16vs Wasatch Hills-Luu/ParryWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Hofmann / Jane McQuade vs Kara Sargent / Jordyn Parry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-09vs Sports Mall-Marz/DuranWon 10
W#1 DoublesKarina Herman / Marinn Patch vs Lynette Duran / Emma Heiden6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-02vs Liberty Park Tennis-Kemp/WallaceWon 20
W#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Carlene Kemp / Anna Kemp7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarinn Patch vs Morgan Behymer6-4, 6-2
2024-04-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Kimberly Simpson / Arashan Heikkila2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann vs Virginia Brodd / Sarah Blake2-6, 4-6
2024-04-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Christina Mooney / LIZ CARLSON3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-Kemp/WallaceWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Ann Phillips vs Lora Cobabe / Chantel Henderson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Pamela Hofmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Amy Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.22
Cyndi Jones
usually #1 Singles 61%, also #2 Singles 28% · published 4.5
4.13
Britney Klaetsch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.05
Meghan Clark
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.05
Sue Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Karina Herman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
4.03
Jen Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.00
Paige Miller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.94
Ann Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.91
Tracy Derby
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.86
Cathy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Janine Nesseth
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Marinn Patch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rochelle Obrien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Britney Klaetsch + Michelle Thompson7362% games+18.3% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Paige Miller7160% games+7.5% vs expected
Paige Miller + Pamela Hofmann6161% games+4.9% vs expected
Karina Herman + Amy Woolley321256% games+4.3% vs expected
Paige Miller + Jen Dickey11460% games+4.0% vs expected
Amy Woolley + Jen Dickey13556% games+2.1% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Pamela Hofmann6850% games+0.3% vs expected
Rochelle Obrien + Jen Dickey6650% games−0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pamela Hofmann
34W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 13 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Cyndi Jones
154W–124L career · 18 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Britney Klaetsch
18W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Jane McQuade
266W–179L career · 7 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
4.11
Meghan Clark
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Sue Curtis
49W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Karina Herman
63W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Jen Dickey
97W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Paige Miller
80W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Ann Phillips
59W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.94
Tracy Derby
65W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
4.5
Cathy Davis
47W–78L career · 7 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
Janine Nesseth
23W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marinn Patch
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Thompson
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rochelle Obrien
45W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.