Teams

Sports Mall-Widerburg/Vietor

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

17 players · average NTRP 4.39 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs Liberty Park Tennis-Woodbury/MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Megan Rytting vs Jen Dickey / Paige Miller2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Picou / Maribel Alvarez vs Jane McQuade / Sue Curtis6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-23vs Wasatch Hills-Luu/ParryWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaribel Alvarez vs Electra Cochran6-2, 6-3
2024-05-16vs Sports Mall-Marz/DuranSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaribel Alvarez vs Emma Heiden3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Widerburg / Megan Rytting vs Ashley Park / Michelle Jaskierny3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bliss / Maribel Alvarez vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Holli Turner6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesWendy Widerburg / Megan Rytting vs Cathy Davis / Sue Curtis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMaribel Alvarez vs Emily Letts2-6, 1-6
2024-04-11vs Sports Mall-Marz/DuranLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaty Alder / Megan Rytting vs Emma Heiden / Lynette Duran1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Widerburg/Vietor62281233336
2Wasatch Hills-Luu/Parry53231739328
3Sports Mall-Marz/Duran35192145365
4Liberty Park Tennis-Kemp/Wallace0893164428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Brook Vietor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.40
Stephanie Tonin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Bre Debry
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.22
Christina Eischeid
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Kimberly Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
4.15
Jessica Schulz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
4.10
Susan Picou
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.06
Maribel Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.00
Wendy Widerburg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Heidi Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Katy Alder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jennifer Korb
published
Maria Uson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Rytting
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Russell
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Simpson + Christina Eischeid11263% games+14.9% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Brook Vietor12070% games+13.6% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Kimberly Simpson18959% games+10.7% vs expected
Brook Vietor + Heidi Gordon14159% games+9.5% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Megan Rytting5158% games+9.0% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Susan Picou8263% games+7.9% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Brook Vietor6071% games+7.8% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Arashan Heikkila28662% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brook Vietor
150W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Stephanie Tonin
159W–95L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Bre Debry
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Christina Eischeid
124W–56L career · 11 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Kimberly Simpson
136W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.20
Jessica Schulz
131W–50L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Susan Picou
178W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Maribel Alvarez
29W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Wendy Widerburg
111W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
Heidi Gordon
98W–95L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Jennifer Korb
37W–36L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Uson
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Rytting
98W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Russell
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.