Teams

Sh.Marconi18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-31vs Kr.Esham18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMeghan OFerral vs Karen Bornhofen7-5, 6-4
2023-07-17vs Ke.O'Rourke18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeghan OFerral vs Alise Fredrickson1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesShannon Marconi vs Samantha Siano6-4, 6-0
2023-07-10vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 10
W#3 SinglesShannon Clarkson vs Carol Ann Mcmillan6-1, 6-2
2023-07-03vs La.McRee18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesClaire Limon vs Rossi Evans6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesShannon Clarkson vs Jill Lewis6-2, 6-4
2023-06-28vs Sa.Highsmith18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesMeghan OFerral vs Anna Goodmon6-2, 6-3
2023-06-26vs Br.Shait18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesClaire Limon vs Lauren Fye6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Steadman vs Erin Maher6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesShannon Marconi vs Toni Austin6-4, 7-5
2023-06-12vs Kr.Levine18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Steadman vs Ellina Max4-6, 3-6
2023-06-05vs St.Fogarty18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeghan OFerral vs Shannon Aumer7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesClaire Limon vs Kathleen Shore6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Claire Limon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Carrie Russell
published 3.5
2.81
Katelyn Steadman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Shannon Clarkson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.72
Meghan OFerral
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.59
Shannon Marconi
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.36
KC Griffin
published
2.09
Lauren Thortsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katelyn Steadman + Shannon Marconi5347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Limon
88W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Carrie Russell
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3
Katelyn Steadman
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Shannon Clarkson
38W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Meghan OFerral
38W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Shannon Marconi
47W–46L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
KC Griffin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.36
Lauren Thortsen
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.