Teams

Sa.Highsmith18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-01vs Br.Shait18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Brianna Shait5-7, 3-6
2023-07-10vs Kr.Levine18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSettle Monroe vs Jessica Williams7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Christine Waychoff5-7, 0-6
2023-07-03vs St.Fogarty18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesMerrit Lumsden vs Rossana Prevost5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Anne Redmond6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Kim Manning6-0, 6-0
2023-06-28vs Sh.Marconi18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Meghan OFerral2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs KC Griffin6-4, 6-0
2023-06-26vs Kr.Esham18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Mary Allison Raper6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Amy Cantando6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Amy Gadke6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-06-12vs Ke.O'Rourke18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Alise Fredrickson6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Colleen Tapen1-6, 0-6
2023-06-05vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Latoya Clay7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMerrit Lumsden vs Kisha Bryant6-2, 6-0
2023-05-22Won 20
W#2 SinglesSettle Monroe vs Nancy Walters6-4, 7-6
W#3 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Jill Lewis6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Settle Monroe
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Sarah Newton
published
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Sheri Erhart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.44
Merrit Lumsden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.18
Sarah Sims Chesson
published
2.17
Maeve Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Anna Goodmon6355% games+2.9% vs expected
Sheri Erhart + Kristen Patch2350% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Patch + Merrit Lumsden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Settle Monroe
65W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
Sarah Newton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Anna Goodmon
76W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Merrit Lumsden
16W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.44
Sarah Sims Chesson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Maeve Gardner
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.