Teams

SPANISH OAKS

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-13vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Vikki Doak vs Valeria Perdomo / Janet Spelman4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJune Sartini / Shay Momiroff vs Barbie Quinn / Sandie Mainwal-Price2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Schwartz / Aldema Ridge vs Patricia Freeman / Jane Casovan0-6, 0-6
2021-05-06vs DTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Vikki Doak vs Jeanie Alaimo / Susan Castelli2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoris Gagne / Shay Momiroff vs Jill Paige / Kay Higer3-4
L#3 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Ellen Arcella vs Bonnie Longenecker / Cheryl Weiss2-6, 5-7
2021-04-29vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesVikki Doak / Annabel Elliott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAldema Ridge / Brenda Talley vs Shirley Wu / Suelue Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Arcella / Shay Momiroff vs Tina Felps / Yae Matsuishi1-6, 1-6
2021-04-22vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Vikki Doak vs Debbie Hicks / Brenda Rowles3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShay Momiroff / Doris Gagne vs Kayleen Krahenbuhl / Cindi Ray4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz vs Natalie Gamberg / Cara McMillin3-6, 3-6
2021-04-15vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesVikki Doak / Annabel Elliott vs Minette Curnutt / Cherry Marshall3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJune Sartini / Shay Momiroff vs Marisa Ptak / Marie Ramsey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEllen Arcella / Aldema Ridge vs Aida Shirley / Pamela Rusk2-6, 0-6
2021-04-08vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Vikki Doak vs Holly Dexter / Helen Johnson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDoris Gagne / June Sartini vs Kathy Martin / Patricia Labbe3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Talley / Carla Kuhl vs Sally Zimmerman / Adela Smith0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-03-25vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDoris Gagne / Annabel Elliott vs Susan Sadler / Dixie Stephens6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesShay Momiroff / Brenda Talley vs Linda Brinker / Carol McDermott6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEllen Arcella / Vicki Schwartz vs Ginger Nakamura / Merlee Vitug1-6, 1-6
2021-03-18vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSLost 12
W#1 DoublesVikki Doak / Annabel Elliott vs Blanca Avila / Sonya Hillman6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrenda Talley / Doris Gagne vs Judith Kraus / Cheryl Landholm2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJune Sartini / Ellen Arcella vs ELMA DALLAL / Laurie Lenhart2-6, 1-6
2021-03-11vs SPANISH TRAIL #3Lost 12
W#1 DoublesVikki Doak / Annabel Elliott vs Angela Zobrist / Julie Christensen7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDoris Gagne / Aldema Ridge vs Sandi Martin / Kathie Dye2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz vs Abbi Jaster / Sabine Curtis0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Vikki Doak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Annabel Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aldema Ridge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brenda Talley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
June Sartini
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Doris Gagne
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Ellen Arcella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Shay Momiroff
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annabel Elliott + Vikki Doak6945% games−2.6% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Ellen Arcella21136% games−2.7% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Carla Kuhl11036% games−4.3% vs expected
Carla Kuhl + Brenda Talley31638% games−5.6% vs expected
Vikki Doak + Brenda Talley2837% games−6.3% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Brenda Talley4937% games−11.7% vs expected
June Sartini + Annabel Elliott9853% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Arcella + Aldema Ridge21432% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vikki Doak
40W–85L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Annabel Elliott
119W–186L career · 9 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Aldema Ridge
29W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Brenda Talley
31W–134L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
June Sartini
27W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Doris Gagne
18W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Ellen Arcella
17W–88L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Shay Momiroff
23W–27L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.